Honorable Richard Pena Raymond, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM:
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB3342 by Naishtat (Relating to representation of and by the state and joinder of the state in certain mental health proceedings.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill clarifies that the state shall be made party in a habeas corpus proceeding in which an inpatient mental health facility or physician is a party as a result of enforcing a commitment order.
According to the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) this provision reflects current practice and therefore should not result in any additional cost to the State.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.