LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 24, 2011

TO:
Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
 
FROM:
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB762 by Carona (Relating to the transfer of an ad valorem tax lien; providing for the imposition of an administrative penalty.), As Passed 2nd House

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend Chapter 32 of the Tax Code, regarding property taxation, tax liens and personal liability, to permit, rather than require, a tax collector's certification of lien transferral to be in one document for properties for which the property owner has executed an authorization consenting to a transfer of the tax liens for both the taxes that are delinquent, and the taxes that are not delinquent.
 
The bill would prohibit a tax lien transferee from charging fees for post-closing expenses related to tax lien transfers, except for certain specified fees.  Allowed fees would include the currently allowed 18 percent interest a year on advanced funds; filing fees for the release of the tax lien; fee for providing a payoff statement; fee for providing currently owed balance information; and those fees proposed to be authorized in a contract between a property tax lender and a property owner that a property owner is required to pay after closing.  For defaults on residential property owned and used by the property owner for personal, family, or household purposes when any part of an installment remains unpaid 10 days after the due date (including Sundays and holidays), a contract between the property owner and the transferee (property tax lender) could provide for additional interest of 5 cents for each $1 of a scheduled installment.  A tax lien transferee would not be required to release payoff information on a property with a delinquent transferred tax lien unless the requestor properly completed the prescribed request form.  The bill would strike the current limit on attorney’s fees that a transferee is entitled to recover, which is 10 percent of the judgment for foreclosure suits that result in foreclosure of the lien.
 
The bill would amend Chapter 351 of the Finance Code, regarding property tax lenders, to add new Section 351.0021 which would delineate the authorized charges to be included in a contract between a property tax lender and a property owner.  Unless a fee is expressly authorized, a property tax lender would be prohibited from charging any fee, other than interest, after closing for a tax lien transfer of residential property used for personal, family, or household purposes.  The bill would provide that except for certain charges, including fees for copies, any amount charged by a property tax lender after closing must be for services performed by a person that is not an employee of the property tax lender.  The Finance Commission would be authorized to adopt rules.
 
The bill would amend Section 351.006 of the Finance Code to authorize the Finance Commissioner to assess an administrative penalty regardless of whether the violation is knowing or willful against a person who violates Section 32.06(b-1) of the Tax Code, which currently requires that by the 10th business day of receipt a transferee send by certified mail a copy of the sworn document describing the tax lien transfer to any mortgage servicer and to each holder of a recorded first lien.

The bill would make procedural changes in the treatment of tax lien transfers, related fees, defaults and charges.  These proposals would not change taxable values, tax rates or any other variable affecting property tax revenues and, consequently, would not create a fiscal impact to the state or units of local government. 

Costs and fees associated with the implementation of the bill for the Office of the Consumer Credit Commissioner are not considered in this analysis because fiscal impacts for this agency would be realized outside of the Treasury due to this agency being Self-Directed and Semi-Independent.

The bill would take effect September 1, 2011


Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 466 Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner
LBB Staff:
JOB, KK, AG, SD, SJS