BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 25 |
By: Branch |
Higher Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that current formula funding allocations for institutions of higher education generally reward increasing enrollments. Recently enacted legislation has emphasized a funding model designed to provide incentives and reward a strong focus on helping students complete their degrees.
C.S.H.B. 25 seeks to build upon these efforts by requiring a minimum level of success-based funding for certain institutions of higher education in the general appropriations bill for the 2016-2017 state fiscal biennium, with that minimum set to increase for the next biennium, and removing the existing cap on such funding.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 25 amends the Education Code to require, in the general appropriations bill prepared for introduction to the legislature by the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), at least 25 percent of the total amount of general revenue appropriations of base funds for undergraduate education for all general academic teaching institutions, other than public state colleges, for a state fiscal biennium to be based on student success measures. The bill adds temporary provisions, set to expire September 1, 2017, to specify that the requirement does not apply to a state fiscal biennium before the 2018-2019 state fiscal biennium and to require, in the general appropriations bill prepared for introduction to the legislature by the LBB for the 2016-2017 state fiscal biennium, at least 15 percent of the total amount of general revenue appropriations of base funds for undergraduate education for all general academic teaching institutions, other than public state colleges, for that state fiscal biennium to be based on student success measures. The bill requires the director of the LBB, under the direction of the LBB, to consider the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board's recommendations relating to institutional appropriations of funds in preparing the general appropriations bill to comply with the bill's requirements.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 25 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|