BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 62 |
By: Guillen |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Judges are not currently prohibited from holding a financial interest in a private correctional or rehabilitation facility. C.S.H.B. 62 seeks to ensure that there is no conflict of interest when trying cases by imposing restrictions on such financial interests.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 62 amends the Government Code to prohibit a justice or judge, as applicable, of the supreme court, the court of criminal appeals, a court of appeals, a district court, a county court, a county court at law, or a statutory probate court from having, on the date the person takes office as a justice or judge or while serving as a justice or judge, a significant interest in a business entity that owns, manages, or operates the following: a community residential facility; a correctional or rehabilitation facility; or any other facility intended to provide housing, supervision, counseling, personal, social, and work adjustment training, or other programs to a person convicted of a misdemeanor or felony or found to have engaged in delinquent conduct who is housed in the facility while serving a sentence of confinement following conviction of an offense or an adjudication of delinquent conduct or who is housed in the facility as a condition of community supervision, probation, parole, or mandatory supervision. The bill sets out the conditions under which a justice or judge is considered to have a significant interest in such a business entity for the purposes of the bill's provisions. The bill establishes that a violation of the prohibition by a justice or judge is considered a violation of certain provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct relating to financial activities. The bill requires a justice or judge who has an interest in a business entity that is prohibited under the bill's provisions to report the interest to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
January 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 62 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|