BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 167 |
By: McClendon |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Texas statutes do not currently provide a mechanism for victim-offender mediation programs, which allow offenders to take responsibility for their actions and for victims to have expedited relief for the harm suffered. Interested parties contend that legislation providing for restorative justice programs, such as victim-offender mediation programs, in cases involving certain offenses is necessary because these programs reduce recidivism and are more cost-effective than incarceration. In an effort to hold defendants who commit property misdemeanors accountable for the criminal conduct and to allow victims to circumvent slow legal proceedings, C.S.H.B. 167 authorizes a county and a municipality to establish a victim-offender mediation program.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 167 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize the commissioners court of a county or governing body of a municipality, in coordination with the office of the attorney representing the state in the county or municipality, to establish a pretrial victim-offender mediation program for a person who has been arrested for or charged with a misdemeanor property offense in any court in Texas other than a district court and has not previously been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor other than a misdemeanor regulating traffic and punishable by fine only. The bill authorizes a county court, statutory county court, municipal court, or justice court that implements a program to adopt administrative rules and local rules of procedure as necessary or appropriate to implement or operate the program. The bill authorizes the commissioners court of a county or governing body of a municipality that establishes a pretrial victim-offender mediation program to allow for referral to the program of an arrested person who otherwise meets the program criteria but has not yet been formally charged with an offense; to adopt administrative rules and local rules of procedure as necessary or appropriate to implement or operate the program; and to approve additional program requirements as recommended by the attorney representing the state.
C.S.H.B. 167 sets out pretrial victim-offender mediation program requirements relating to the designation of defendants who are eligible to participate, the requisite victim's consent, the requisite consent of the attorney representing the state, and the binding mediation agreement into which the defendant must enter. The bill provides for the confidentiality of all communications made in a pretrial victim-offender mediation program, the use of staff and other resources of pretrial services departments and community supervision and corrections departments to assist the court or the attorney representing the state in monitoring a defendant's compliance with a mediation agreement, and the authority of a court-appointed mediator who meets certain training requirements or any other appropriate person designated by the court to conduct a pretrial victim-offender mediation. The bill prohibits the attorney representing the state and the attorney representing the defendant in the criminal action from serving as a mediator under the program.
C.S.H.B. 167 authorizes a court to defer the proceedings without accepting a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or entering an adjudication of guilt for a defendant who enters a pretrial victim-offender mediation program and prohibits the court from requiring the defendant to admit guilt or enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to enter the program. The bill sets out the circumstances under which the case of a defendant participating in a pretrial victim-offender mediation program must be returned to the docket and proceed through the regular criminal justice system and provides for the defendant's retention of rights when a case is returned to the docket and for the running of the period of the applicable statute of limitation while the defendant is enrolled in the program. The bill authorizes the attorney representing the state or the court to extend the initial compliance period granted to the defendant. The bill makes final a determination by the court regarding whether the mediation agreement has been successfully completed.
C.S.H.B. 167 requires the court, on the defendant's motion and only if the defendant is not arrested or convicted of a subsequent felony or misdemeanor, other than a misdemeanor regulating traffic and punishable by fine only, on or before the first anniversary of the date the defendant successfully completed a mediation agreement, to enter an order of nondisclosure as if the defendant had received a discharge and dismissal for deferred adjudication community supervision with respect to all records and files related to the defendant's arrest for the offense for which the defendant entered the pretrial victim-offender mediation program.
C.S.H.B. 167 requires a mediation agreement to be written, signed by the defendant and the victim, and ratified by the attorney representing the state in the attorney's request for a court order to document and approve the mediation agreement for the record. The bill authorizes a mediation agreement to require testing, counseling, and treatment of the defendant to address alcohol abuse, abuse of controlled substances, mental health, or anger management or any other service that is reasonably related to the offense for which the defendant was arrested or charged. The bill limits the period during which a mediation agreement is valid to not more than one year after the date on which the mediation agreement is ratified, unless the court and the attorney representing the state approve the extension of the agreement, and establishes that such an agreement does not constitute a plea or legal admission of responsibility.
C.S.H.B. 167 provides for legislative review of pretrial victim-offender mediation programs and authorizes the commissioners court of a county or governing body of a municipality to request a management, operations, or financial or accounting audit of a pretrial victim-offender mediation program. The bill requires such a program to collect from a defendant in the program a reasonable program participation fee not to exceed $500 and authorizes the program to collect from the defendant an alcohol or controlled substance testing, counseling, and treatment fee in an amount necessary to cover the costs of any testing, counseling, or treatment required by the mediation agreement. The bill provides for the payment of such fees on a periodic basis or on a deferred payment schedule and requires the fees to be based on the defendant's ability to pay and to be used only for purposes specific to the program. The bill requires the office of an attorney representing the state that participates in a pretrial victim-offender mediation program to notify the public by posting information about the program on the office's website.
C.S.H.B. 167 sets a $15 court cost, in addition to the program participation fee, to be collected from a defendant who participates in and successfully completes a pretrial victim-offender mediation program or is convicted. The bill establishes procedures for the collection and deposit of such costs into certain county or municipal funds and the purposes for which the money is required to be spent by a county or municipality that collects such costs.
C.S.H.B. 167 amends the Government Code to make conforming changes relating to the additional court costs collected to help fund pretrial victim-offender mediation programs.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 167 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|