BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 278 |
By: Craddick |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that private companies are relocating to Texas to research, develop, and launch commercial space flights and that some local governments are partnering with these commercial space flight companies in an effort to diversify economic development. Under current law, a municipality is liable only to the extent permitted under the Texas Tort Claims Act when engaged in a governmental function, a term that includes airports. However, that act does not expressly include a municipal airport used for space flight activities as a governmental function. C.S.H.B. 278 seeks to promote the development of a commercial space launch industry in Texas by addressing municipal liability under the Texas Tort Claims Act.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 278 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to include damages arising from the use of an airport for space flight activities among the damages arising from a municipality's governmental functions for which the municipality is liable under the Texas Tort Claims Act. The bill establishes that the common law doctrine of vicarious liability because of participation in a joint enterprise does not impose liability for a claim brought on a municipality with respect to the use of a municipal airport for space flight activities, unless the municipality would otherwise be liable under the Texas Tort Claims Act. The bill specifies that provisions relating to governmental liability with respect to participation in a joint enterprise do not affect a limitation on liability or damages provided under the Texas Tort Claims Act, including a limitation on the amount of tort liability of the state government.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 278 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|