BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 338 |
By: Guillen |
Licensing & Administrative Procedures |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Under current law, a hearing on a towed vehicle must be held in the justice court having jurisdiction in the precinct from which the vehicle was towed, but interested parties contend that it is inconvenient for the owner of a towed vehicle to attend a hearing in one precinct and then travel to another precinct where the vehicle is stored. C.S.H.B. 338 seeks to mitigate the inconvenience by allowing the hearing to be in any justice court having jurisdiction in the county from which the vehicle was towed.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 338 amends the Occupations Code to require a hearing regarding a towed motor vehicle to be in any justice court having jurisdiction in the county, rather than in the precinct, from which the vehicle was towed. The bill revises the required contents of the notice for such a hearing to require the notice to include a statement of the person's right to request a hearing in any justice court having jurisdiction in the county from which the vehicle was towed and to require the notice to include, in addition to certain contact information for each such justice court, the address of an Internet website maintained by the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System that contains such information.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 338 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|