BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 385 |
By: Thompson, Senfronia |
County Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Under current law, an official bond is required of certain county officials before they assume the duties of the office to which they were elected or appointed, and the county commissioners court is required to approve those bonds. A bond is also required of a district attorney and a criminal district attorney. Interested parties contend that it would be more efficient if a county could choose to self-insure against losses normally covered by a bond, and they further maintain that this could cause counties to realize savings in the administrative time needed to secure the bond. C.S.H.B. 385 seeks to address this issue in an effort to provide a county with the option to self-insure and to more efficiently ease the transition into office for elected or appointed officials.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 385 amends the Government Code to establish that a district attorney or a criminal district attorney is not required to execute the required bond of office and may perform the duties of office if the commissioners court of each county in the district or the county served by the attorney, as applicable, by order authorizes the county to self-insure against losses that would have been covered by the bond. The bill requires such an order adopted by a commissioners court to be kept and recorded by the county clerk.
C.S.H.B. 385 amends the Local Government Code to establish that, notwithstanding any other law requiring a county officer or employee to execute a bond as a condition of office or employment, a county officer or employee is not required to execute the bond and may perform the duties of office or employment if the commissioners court by order authorizes the county to self-insure against losses that would have been covered by the bond and the county judge approves the adopted order if the county judge was required to approve the bond under the other law. The bill requires such an order adopted by the commissioners court to be kept and recorded by the county clerk.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 385 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|