BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 460 |
By: Cortez |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Under current law, a county clerk is authorized to issue a marriage license but is not included among those who are authorized to conduct a marriage ceremony. C.S.H.B. 460 seeks to provide couples with an additional option in choosing the person who conducts their marriage ceremony by authorizing certain county clerks and deputy clerks to conduct marriage ceremonies.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 460 amends the Family Code and the Government Code to authorize the county clerk in a county with a population of at least 1.7 million that contains a municipality in which at least 75 percent of the county's population resides, and any deputy clerk appointed by the clerk, to conduct a marriage ceremony. The bill requires such a clerk or deputy clerk who conducts a marriage ceremony to collect a $25 fee for conducting the ceremony and deposit the fee in the county treasury to be used by the county only to fund charitable organizations that assist or provide care for victims of family violence or of child abuse or neglect or that provide family violence prevention services.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 460 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|