BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 461 |
By: Menéndez |
Homeland Security & Public Safety |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that a recent attorney general opinion relating to peace officer exemptions from the Private Security Act mistakenly focuses on an officer's job title and current duties, rather than on the officer's training and licensing by the Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education. C.S.H.B. 461 proposes to resolve this issue by changing the circumstances under which certain peace officers are exempt from the Private Security Act.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 461 amends the Occupations Code to make the exemption from the Private Security Act for certain peace officers apply to a person who is a chief of police, sheriff, constable, or other chief administrator of a law enforcement agency in Texas or who is employed by the chief administrator of a law enforcement agency as a peace officer in accordance with the licensing requirements provided for by the rules of the Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education and who is privately employed as a patrolman, guard, extra job coordinator, or watchman, rather than making the exemption apply to a person who has full-time employment as a peace officer who is privately employed in that capacity. The bill, in the requirement that such an exempt peace officer not be in the employ of another peace officer, specifies that the exemption applies if the private employment does not require the peace officer to be in the employ of another peace officer. The bill, in the requirement that such an exempt peace officer work as a peace officer on the average of at least 32 hours a week, specifies that the exemption applies if the peace officer works for the law enforcement agency by which the officer is employed on that average.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 461 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|