BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 474 |
By: Muņoz, Jr. |
Transportation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Observers note that differences in truck weight-limit regulations between Texas and Mexico are requiring some produce companies located in the Rio Grande Valley to unload their shipments before crossing the border and to divide shipments into multiple trucks before driving on international bridges. Interested parties assert that the stop in Mexico is especially inefficient because produce companies often stop again in Hidalgo County to split the produce for distribution throughout Texas, and they contend that these produce companies, the cities in which the companies are located, and economic development corporations support the designation of an overweight vehicle corridor to avoid the additional stop. These parties also contend that produce companies support the corridor and, due to their cargo's perishability, would be willing to pay a fee to avoid the extra stop in Mexico.
Recent legislation has designated overweight vehicle corridors in other areas of Texas, which interested parties say have been instrumental in moving cargo more efficiently. C.S.H.B. 474 seeks to allow a more efficient transport of commerce, including perishable fresh produce, through a portion of Hidalgo County.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Texas Transportation Commission in SECTION 1 of this bill.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 474 amends the Transportation Code to provide an optional procedure for the issuance of a permit by a governmental entity for the movement of oversize or overweight vehicles carrying agricultural products on certain roads located in Hidalgo County. The bill authorizes the Texas Transportation Commission to authorize a governmental entity to issue permits for the movement of oversize or overweight vehicles carrying agricultural products in Hidalgo County on specific segments of U.S. Highway 281, State Highway 336, Spur 29, Doffin Canal Road, and Farm-to-Market Roads 1016, 396, and 2061 or on another route designated by the commission in consultation with the entity. The bill requires the permit-issuing governmental entity to serve the same geographic location as the roads over which the permit is valid.
C.S.H.B. 474 authorizes the governmental entity to collect a fee for the permits for the movement of oversize or overweight vehicles carrying agricultural products on the specified Hidalgo County roads. The bill, beginning September 1, 2013, caps the fee at $80 per trip. The bill authorizes the entity, on September 1 of each subsequent year, to adjust the maximum fee amount as necessary to reflect the percentage change during the preceding year in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), U.S. City Average, published monthly by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics or its successor in function. The bill restricts the use of the fees to the construction and maintenance of the specific roads described by or designated under the bill's provisions and to the payment of the entity's administrative costs, which are capped at 15 percent of the fees collected. The bill requires the entity to make payments to the Texas Department of Transportation to provide funds for the maintenance of the specified roads and highways subject to the bill's provisions.
C.S.H.B. 474 sets out content requirements for the specific information to be included on such a permit and requires the governmental entity to report to the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles all permits issued under the bill's provisions. The bill requires such a permit to specify the time during which movement authorized by the permit is allowed. The bill prohibits movement authorized by such a permit from exceeding the posted speed limit or 55 miles per hour, whichever is less, and specifies that a violation of this prohibition constitutes a moving violation.
C.S.H.B. 474 grants the Department of Public Safety the authority to enforce the bill's provisions and authorizes the commission to adopt rules necessary to implement those provisions.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013. |
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 474 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill. |
||||||
|