BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 586 |
By: Workman |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Although the State of Texas and its agencies are generally immune from suit under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, statutory provisions allow the adjudication of certain contract claims against state governmental agencies if the claim is for less than a specified dollar amount in damages. Concerned parties assert that for a breach of contract claim that seeks a greater amount in damages, an aggrieved party's only recourse is to seek a waiver of sovereign immunity from the legislature because the law does not adequately address procedures for adjudicating such claims. C.S.H.B. 586 seeks to address the need for such procedures by establishing a waiver of sovereign immunity for certain claims arising under contracts with state agencies.
|
||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 586 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to establish a waiver of sovereign immunity to suit for an agency, department, commission, bureau, board, office, council, court, or other entity that is in any branch of state government and is created by statute or the Texas Constitution, including a university system or a system of higher education, and that is authorized by statute or the constitution to enter into a contract and enters into a written contract for engineering, architectural, or construction services or for materials related to those services. The bill establishes this waiver for the purpose of adjudicating a claim for breach of an express provision of such a contract brought by a party to the contract and subjects the waiver to the terms and conditions of the bill's provisions.
C.S.H.B. 586 limits the total amount of money awarded in an adjudication brought against a state agency for breach of an express provision of such a contract to the balance due and owed by the state agency under the contract as it may have been amended, including any amount owed as compensation for the increased cost to perform the work as a direct result of owner-caused delays or acceleration if the contract expressly provides for such compensation; to the amount owed for written change orders or additional work required to carry out the contract; to reasonable and necessary attorney's fees based on an hourly rate that are equitable and just if the contract expressly provides for such recovery; and to interest at the rate specified by the contract or, if a rate is not specified, the rate for postjudgment interest determined under the Finance Code, but not to exceed 10 percent. The bill prohibits damages awarded in such an adjudication from including consequential damages, exemplary damages, or damages for unabsorbed home office overhead.
C.S.H.B. 586 makes adjudication procedures that are stated in the contract or that are established by the state agency and expressly incorporated into the contract enforceable except to the extent those procedures conflict with the terms set out in the bill. The bill clarifies that its provisions do not waive a defense or a limitation on damages available to a party to a contract, other than a bar against suit based on sovereign immunity; do not waive sovereign immunity to suit in a federal court; and do not waive sovereign immunity to a claim arising from a cause of action for negligence, fraud, tortious interference with a contract, or any other tort. The bill exempts an employment contract between a state agency and an employee of that agency from the bill's provisions. The bill authorizes a suit to be brought in a district court in a county in which the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred or a county in which the state agency's principal office is located.
C.S.H.B. 586 authorizes satisfaction and payment of a judgment under the bill's provisions to occur only on legislative appropriation of funds in accordance with the Texas Constitution and state statute. The bill exempts property of the state or any agency, department, or office of the state from seizure, attachment, garnishment, or any other creditors' remedy to satisfy a judgment taken under the bill's provisions. The bill prohibits an entity described by the bill's provisions from bringing suit against the state or a unit of state government under Government Code provisions relating to the resolution of contract claims made against the state by an independent contractor who has entered into a contract directly with a unit of state government.
C.S.H.B. 586 amends the Government Code to exempt a claim for breach of a written contract for engineering, architectural, or construction services or for materials related to those services brought by a party to the written contract from the applicability of provisions relating to the resolution of contract claims made against the state by an independent contractor who has entered into a contract directly with a unit of state government.
|
||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 586 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||
|