BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 658 |
By: Sheets |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
For cases in which damages awarded to a plaintiff are subject to a Medicare subrogation lien, interested parties assert that defendants often have to wait for the issuance of a recovery demand letter from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or a designated contractor before making payment on the judgment. There is concern that postjudgment interest may accrue on the unpaid damages while a defendant is waiting for this letter, increasing the total amount that must be paid by the defendant. Given that the issuance and delivery of the recovery demand letter are not under the defendant's control, interested parties contend that such defendants should not be forced to pay additional costs due to delay caused by a third party. C.S.H.B. 658 seeks to create a fairer subrogation payment process by tolling postjudgment interest on the portion of an award subject to Medicare subrogation during certain periods.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 658 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to establish that postjudgment interest does not accrue on the unpaid balance of an award of damages to a plaintiff attributable to any portion of the award to which the United States has a subrogation right under federal Medicare law before the defendant receives a recovery demand letter issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or a designated contractor. The bill establishes that such postjudgment interest does not accrue if the defendant pays the unpaid balance before the 31st day after the date the defendant receives the recovery demand letter. The bill's provisions do not apply if the defendant appeals the award of damages and do not prevent the accrual of postjudgment interest on any portion of an award to which the United States does not have a subrogation right.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 658 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|