BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 840 |
By: Guillen |
Culture, Recreation & Tourism |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Current law requires breeder deer to have unique identifying numbers for disease-tracking purposes and requires breeder deer held in a permitted facility to be identified by a durable identification tag, although the deer cannot be moved from the facility unless the deer have been permanently tattooed in one ear with the assigned identification number. Such a tag includes, but is not limited to, newly developed technologies, including radio frequency tags.
Interested parties contend that the law does not do enough to clarify that the newly developed technologies can be used in place of or in addition to other prescribed identification requirements. The parties assert that implantable microchips are an accepted, reliable, and viable veterinarian tool for animal identification and have numerous advantages over ear tagging and tattooing. Ear tags can fall off, be torn off, or be chewed on by other deer, resulting in permanent disfigurement and frequent ear infections, and tattoos can be applied improperly or become unreadable and also can be distorted and marked over to cover illegal activity. The parties maintain that inadvertent mistakes can create serious impediments for accurate identification, herd inventory, and tracking, all of which are critical components of mandated disease monitoring.
The interested parties also note that there is an agreement between the deer breeding industry and the Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) that allows for a breeder to remove the durable identification tag from a breeder deer immediately before releasing or transporting a breeder deer to a release site, provided that the tags are in the breeder's possession for purposes of TPWD inspection. C.S.H.B. 840 seeks to codify this practice and to clarify that radio frequency tags or implantable microchips are acceptable options as a secondary form of identification for breeder deer. The bill also seeks to require the Parks and Wildlife Commission to adopt certain rules allowing for proper implementation of these forms of identification.
|
||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Parks and Wildlife Commission in SECTIONS 1 and 3 of this bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 840 amends the Parks and Wildlife Code to require the primary form of identification for a breeder deer to be an ear tag that is permanently and legibly marked with a unique identification number. The bill requires the secondary form of identification for a breeder deer to be either an ear tattoo or an electronic identification device, defined to mean an implantable microchip or a radio frequency identification button tag placed in one ear of a breeder deer. The bill establishes deadlines for the identification of a breeder deer by the primary and a secondary form of identification for deer born before April 1, 2014, and for deer born on or after that date.
C.S.H.B. 840 requires each deer to be assigned a unique identification number and establishes a numbering system for the assignment of such a unique identification number applicable specifically to each of four categories of breeder deer as follows: · for a breeder deer born before April 1, 2014, with a tattoo as the secondary form of identification, the unique identification number is the four-character unique number assigned by the Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and specific to that deer; · for a breeder deer born before April 1, 2014, with an electronic identification device as the secondary form of identification, the unique identification number is a 19-digit number consisting of the four-character unique number already assigned to that specific deer and the 15-digit number associated with the electronic identification device; · for a breeder deer born on or after April 1, 2014, with a tattoo as the secondary form of identification, the unique identification number is an alphanumeric identifier of not more than five characters assigned by TPWD; · for a breeder deer born on or after April 1, 2014, with an electronic identification device as the secondary form of identification, the unique identification number is the 15-digit number associated with the electronic identification device.
C.S.H.B. 840 requires the primary form of identification for a breeder deer in each of the first three categories of breeder deer to contain the four- or five-character unique number assigned to the specific deer by TPWD and, for a deer in the last category of breeder deer, requires the primary form of identification to contain no more than five digits of the unique identification number contained in the electronic identification device as provided by Parks and Wildlife Commission rule.
C.S.H.B. 840 establishes that a deer breeder is not required to remove the primary form of identification for any purpose but authorizes the deer breeder to remove and replace the primary form of identification immediately to meet the identification requirements. The bill prohibits a deer breeder from removing the secondary form of identification unless it is an electronic identification device that fails or is lost. The bill requires the deer breeder to replace an electronic identification device that fails or is lost and report the replacement of the device to TPWD so that a new unique identification number can be assigned to that specific breeder deer.
C.S.H.B. 840 prohibits a person from removing or knowingly permitting the removal of a breeder deer held in a breeder facility unless the breeder deer possesses a secondary form of identification in compliance with the bill's provisions. The bill prohibits a person from knowingly accepting or permitting the acceptance of a breeder deer into a breeder facility unless the breeder deer possesses such a secondary form of identification. The bill requires a deer breeder who uses an electronic identification device as a secondary form of identification to provide an authorized TPWD employee with a working device capable of reading the electronic identification as needed for inspection purposes. The bill authorizes the primary form of identification to be removed from a breeder deer immediately before the deer is transported to a release site, provided that the person transporting the deer has possession of the ear tag for each deer being transported and provides the ear tag to an authorized TPWD employee on request for inspection purposes.
C.S.H.B. 840 authorizes the Parks and Wildlife Commission to adopt rules to prescribe eligible forms of electronic identification devices to ensure that the identification numbers are unique and conform to appropriate standards and can be integrated into the department's deer breeder database application; to designate appropriate locations for the placement of an implantable microchip; and to prescribe reporting procedures for the replacement of an electronic identification device that fails or is lost.
C.S.H.B. 840 removes statutory provisions relating to the requirement for each breeder deer held in a permitted deer breeding facility to be identified with a durable identification tag bearing a unique alphanumeric number of not more than four characters assigned by TPWD. The bill removes statutory provisions prohibiting a person from removing or knowingly permitting the removal of a breeder deer held in a deer breeding facility, or knowingly accepting or permitting the acceptance of a breeder deer into a deer breeding facility, unless the breeder deer has been permanently and legibly tattooed in one ear with the appropriate unique identification number.
C.S.H.B. 840 requires the Parks and Wildlife Commission, not later than March 1, 2014, to adopt rules as necessary under the bill's provisions relating to the implementation of electronic identification devices. The bill requires TPWD, not later than March 1, 2014, to approve and publish a list of radio frequency identification button tags and microchip implants as authorized for use in identifying breeder deer.
|
||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 840 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|