BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1043 |
By: Lewis |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties observe that although federal law governs the protection of sound recordings made after February 15, 1972, the protection of sound recordings fixed before that date is currently left to the states. The parties report that in adopting laws to protect against piracy of pre-1972 sound recordings, a majority of states have included express exemptions for activities such as broadcasting. However, the parties contend that under current Texas law, broadcasters are not expressly exempted from the statutory prohibitions against the unauthorized duplication of pre-1972 sound recordings. C.S.H.B. 1043 seeks to clarify state law on this subject by expressly exempting certain broadcasters in order to conform such law to that of other states.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1043 amends the Business & Commerce Code to exempt from the offense of unauthorized duplication of recordings initially fixed before February 15, 1972, a person engaged in radio or television broadcasting who transfers, or causes to be transferred, a recording for archival purposes or intended for or in connection with a radio or television broadcast.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1043 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|