BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1100 |
By: Otto |
Human Services |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas, Inc. (CACTX) is the state membership organization for all of the local children's advocacy centers across the state. Over the past few years, CACTX has worked with stakeholders to update and elevate the statewide standards that govern the type of services provided by each local center and, as a result of this work, has compiled a set of evidence-based standards reflective of best practices in the field for the delivery of center services. While many centers are already implementing these practices, C.S.H.B. 1100 intends to codify these new standards.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1100 amends the Family Code to include among the eligibility requirements for a public entity that operated as a children's advocacy center before November 1, 1995, or a nonprofit entity to enter into a contract with the statewide organization with which the Department of Family and Protective Services or the office of the attorney general contracts to provide training, technical assistance, and evaluation services for local children's advocacy center programs that the entity implement the following program components: · a case tracking system that monitors statistical information on each child and nonoffending family member or other caregiver who receives services through the center and that includes progress and disposition information for each service the multidisciplinary team determines should be provided to the client; · a child-focused setting that is comfortable, private, and physically and psychologically safe for diverse populations of children and nonoffending family members and other caregivers; · family advocacy and victim support services that include comprehensive case management and victim support services available to each child and the child's nonoffending family members or other caregivers as part of the services the multidisciplinary team determines should be provided to a client; · forensic interviews conducted in a neutral, fact-finding manner and coordinated to avoid duplicative interviewing; · specialized medical evaluation and treatment services that are available to all children who receive services through the center and coordinated with the services the multidisciplinary team determines should be provided to a child; · specialized trauma-focused mental health services that are designed to meet the unique needs of child abuse victims and the victims' nonoffending family members or other caregivers and that are available as part of the services the multidisciplinary team determines should be provided to a client; and · a system to ensure that all services available to center clients are culturally competent and diverse and are coordinated with the services the multidisciplinary team determines should be provided to a client. The bill removes the requirement that a waiver of any contract eligibility requirement for a children's advocacy center granted by the statewide organization be identified in the written contract with the center.
C.S.H.B. 1100 replaces references to videotaped interviews with references to video recorded interviews in provisions relating to the release of a case record and the use, confidentiality, and ownership of certain information and records in an investigation of child abuse and neglect. The bill makes a provision requiring a court to deny a request to reproduce a video recording of an interview of a child made at a children's advocacy center under certain circumstances applicable to a request to reproduce the audio portion of such a video recording.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1100 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|