BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1130 |
By: González, Mary |
International Trade & Intergovernmental Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that, when completed, the Tornillo-Guadalupe Port of Entry will be one of the busiest international entry points in the United States, with the potential to produce substantial and rapid increases in economic activity in a wide area of southeastern El Paso County. This development has the potential to attract numerous transportation-related and border trade industries, produce major traffic increases across a wide area, and increase opportunities for job creation. The parties note, however, that no entity currently has the authority to ensure orderly development in the area.
C.S.H.B. 1130 seeks to ensure such safe and orderly development within the area surrounding the Tornillo-Guadalupe Port of Entry international bridge by setting out a series of development regulations, contingent on voter approval, with the intention of maximizing the value of the area to El Paso, the state, and the nation, as well as protecting the property and health and safety of those in and around the area.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1130 amends the Local Government Code to establish provisions relating to development regulations around the Tornillo-Guadalupe Port of Entry applicable only to a certain unincorporated areas of El Paso County and the remainder of a tract of land partly located in the applicable areas under certain circumstances, and specifically inapplicable to residential property and land in which the state has an interest. The bill authorizes the Commissioners Court of El Paso County to regulate in the applicable areas, and to the extent authorized, specified types of development in the area for specified purposes. The bill authorizes the commissioners court to divide the areas into districts in a certain manner and regulate development within each district. The bill makes the applicability of the regulatory authority of the commissioners court in those areas contingent on a majority of the voters in El Paso County voting in an election held for the purpose of approving the grant of that regulatory authority and sets out procedures for the election. The bill specifies that approval includes the authority to repeal, revise, or amend a previous decision to operate under the bill's provisions.
C.S.H.B. 1130 requires the commissioners court, in order to exercise the powers authorized by the bill's provisions, to create a commission and requires the commission to recommend boundaries for the original districts and appropriate regulations for each district. The bill sets out provisions relating to the composition and administration of the commission. The bill requires the commission to make a preliminary report regarding its recommendations and to hold public hearings on that report before submitting a final report to the commissioners court. The bill prohibits the commissioners court from holding a public hearing or taking final action until it has received the commission's final report and sets out provisions relating to a public hearing notice. The bill requires the commissioners court to establish procedures for adopting and enforcing regulations and district boundaries, establishes that a regulation or district boundary is not effective until it is adopted by the commissioners court after a public hearing on the matter, and sets out related provisions, including provisions relating to a protest to a proposed change to a regulation or boundary written and signed by certain landowners.
C.S.H.B. 1130 authorizes the commissioners court to provide for the appointment of a board of adjustment. The bill authorizes the commissioners court, in regulations adopted under the bill's provisions, to authorize the board of adjustment, in appropriate cases and subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, to make special exceptions to the terms of the regulations that are consistent with the general purpose and intent of the regulations and in accordance with any applicable rules contained in the regulations. The bill sets out provisions relating to the composition and administration of a board of adjustment.
C.S.H.B. 1130 authorizes the board of adjustment to hear and decide an appeal that alleges error in an order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement of the bill's provisions or a regulation adopted under such provisions; to hear and decide special exceptions to the terms of such a regulation when the regulation requires the board to do so; and to authorize in specific cases a variance from the terms of an adopted regulation under certain conditions. The bill sets out related procedural provisions and provisions relating to judicial review of a board decision.
C.S.H.B. 1130 authorizes the commissioners court to adopt orders to enforce the bill's provisions or an order or a regulation adopted under such provisions. The bill makes it a Class B misdemeanor offense to violate such provisions or such an order or regulation, specifies that each day that a violation occurs constitutes a separate offense, and requires trial to be in a county court. The bill makes a person who violates such provisions or such an order or regulation liable to the county for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $1,000 for each day the violation exists. The bill authorizes the appropriate attorney representing the county in civil actions to file a civil action in court to recover the civil penalty and requires the person to reimburse the attorney for the costs of the civil action, including court costs and attorney's fees, if the attorney for the county prevails in the civil action. The bill requires the court to consider the seriousness of the violation in determining the amount of the penalty and requires a recovered penalty to be deposited in the county treasury to the credit of the general fund.
C.S.H.B. 1130 authorizes the appropriate county authority, if a building or other structure is erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, repaired, converted, razed, or maintained or if a building, other structure, or land is used in violation of the bill's provisions or an order or a regulation adopted under such provisions, in addition to other remedies, to institute appropriate action to prevent or remove the unlawful action or use; enjoin, restrain, correct, or abate the violation; prevent the occupancy of the building, structure, or land; or prevent any illegal act, conduct, business, or use on or about the premises.
C.S.H.B. 1130 establishes that if a regulation adopted under the bill's provisions imposes a more stringent standard than a standard required under another statute or local order or regulation, the regulation adopted under the bill's provisions controls, or, if the other statute or local order or regulation imposes a more stringent standard, that statute, order, or regulation controls. The bill authorizes the commissioners court to require the removal, destruction, or change of any structure or use of any property that does not conform to an order or regulation adopted under the bill's provisions only if the court permits the owner's investment in the structure or property to be amortized over a period determined by the court or if the court determines the nonconforming structure or property has been permanently abandoned. The bill makes its provisions or a regulation adopted under such provisions inapplicable to structures or facilities owned or used by an electric utility or to real property, central office buildings, facilities, signs, or other structures, or equipment owned or used by a telecommunications provider. The bill establishes that its provisions do not authorize the commissioners court to require the removal or destruction of property that exists at the time the court implements such provisions or authorize the commissioners court to restrict the right of a landowner, acting on the owner's behalf, to construct improvements for agriculture and ranching operations or to otherwise use the land for agriculture and ranching operations. |
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1130 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|