BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1424 |
By: Moody |
Business & Industry |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties assert that first responders such as police officers and firefighters perform jobs that carry a wide range of inherent dangers. Under current law, these public servants, like any other employee in Texas, may not be discriminated against for pursuing legitimate workers' compensation claims. However, there is concern that, unlike other employees, first responders are unable to seek relief by filing a lawsuit when that right to protection against discrimination with respect to the filing of such a claim is violated because their employers are governmental entities, which enjoy the protections of sovereign or governmental immunity from suit. C.S.H.B. 1424 seeks to put first responders on equal footing with other employees in Texas by waiving that immunity for certain actions involving workers' compensation discrimination.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1424 amends the Labor Code to authorize a first responder who alleges a violation of statutory provisions prohibiting discrimination against an employee in relation to a workers' compensation claim to sue the governmental entity for the relief provided by those statutory provisions. The bill waives and abolishes sovereign or governmental immunity from suit to the extent of liability created under those statutory provisions. The bill does not affect immunity from a claim for damages to the extent a person has official or individual immunity from such a claim. The bill limits the liability of a political subdivision under such statutory provisions to money damages in a maximum amount of $100,000 for each person aggrieved by a violation of those statutory provisions.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1424 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|