BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1477 |
By: Callegari |
Land & Resource Management |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that following the amendment to the state constitution establishing home-rule cities over a century ago, Texas cities engaged in aggressive annexation without incurring any obligation to provide new services in annexed areas. These parties note that in response to this situation the Texas Legislature passed legislation nearly half a century ago regulating numerous aspects of municipal annexation, including the requirement to furnish services equal to those provided to other areas of the city with similar characteristics of topography, patterns of land use, and population density. The parties point out that the legislation also provided for a separate procedure for disannexation if a municipality failed to provide required services and contend that several decades ago, the legislative recodification of that act resulted in a lack of clarity in legislative intent regarding disannexation of an area. C.S.H.B. 1477 seeks to address certain matters relating to a court order to disannex an area from a municipality and to clarify legislative intent regarding such matters.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1477 amends the Local Government Code to add as a required condition under which a district court with a valid petition is required to enter an order disannexing an area a municipality's failure to perform its obligations in accordance with statutory provisions relating to providing full municipal services to an area annexed under a municipal annexation plan, in addition to a municipality's failure to perform its obligations in accordance with a service plan prepared under such provisions. The bill removes a municipality's failure to perform its obligations in good faith as a condition under which a district court is required to enter such an order upon such a finding.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1477 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|