BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1711 |
By: Fletcher |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Recent legislation established civil liability for prohibited barratry and provided for the ability of a client to void any contract for legal services that was procured through such prohibited conduct. Concern has been raised over reports that some attorneys have found a loophole in the law to avoid one of the civil penalties for barratry by releasing their client after a case is "run" and a contract for legal services is signed. Interested parties note that the $10,000 penalty currently assessed applies only when a person is illegally solicited but no legal services contract is signed as a result of that conduct and that there is no such penalty if a legal services contract is signed as a result of that illegal solicitation. In an effort to close this loophole and hold attorneys who commit barratry accountable for their actions, C.S.H.B. 1711 authorizes a client who enters into a legal services contract to recover certain damages and amounts from a person who commits barratry.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1711 amends the Government Code to authorize a client who enters into a contract for legal services that was procured as a result of conduct violating state law or the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas regarding barratry by attorneys or other persons to bring an action to recover any amount that may be awarded to a client who prevails in an action to void such a contract, even if the contract is voided voluntarily. The bill adds a penalty in the amount of $10,000 to the amounts to be recovered in an action filed by a client who enters into such a contract and who prevails either in a suit to void that contract or in a suit to recover amounts that may be awarded. The bill specifies that the expedited actions process created by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure does not apply to a civil action that is filed on the basis of prohibited barratry.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1711 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|