BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1724 |
By: Bohac |
Ways & Means |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There is currently a statute of limitations on the state's authority to assess state taxes and to bring suit to collect delinquent state taxes, including state hotel occupancy taxes, and interest imposed on delinquent state hotel occupancy taxes. However, state law does not impose any such limitation period or interest on municipal or county hotel occupancy taxes. Some local jurisdictions use designated third party companies to conduct audits of the jurisdiction's hotel occupancy taxes. Those companies sometimes expand the scope of an audit to include four or more years' worth of tax records.
There are concerns that hotel operators have no way to predict how long to maintain records because there is no statute of limitations on the assessment of such taxes, and these concerns have caused some hotel operators to contend that the interest rate on delinquent local hotel occupancy taxes should be comparable to the rate applicable to state-imposed taxes. C.S.H.B. 1724 seeks to align local hotel occupancy tax collection more closely with state hotel occupancy tax collection.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1724 amends the Tax Code to make a person who fails to pay a municipal hotel occupancy tax when due liable to the municipality that imposes the tax for interest on the unpaid amount at the greater of the rate set for interest charges on delinquent state-imposed taxes or the rate imposed by the municipality on January 1, 2013, and establishes that the interest accrues from the first day after the date due until the tax is paid. The bill removes statutory provisions specifying that a municipality's right to bring suit against a person who is required to collect a municipal hotel occupancy tax and to pay the collections over to the municipality and who has failed to file a tax report or pay the taxes when due is not barred by certain limitations on suits brought by governmental entities and exempting such a suit and tax from the limitation period for assessing state-imposed taxes and bringing a suit to collect those taxes. The bill instead requires a municipality to bring such a suit not later than the fourth anniversary of the date the tax becomes due. The bill exempts a municipality from this deadline and authorizes the municipality to bring such a suit at any time if, with intent to evade the tax, the person files a false or fraudulent report with the municipality or if the person has not filed a report for the tax with the municipality.
C.S.H.B. 1724 requires a county to bring suit against an owner or operator of a hotel required to report and send county hotel occupancy taxes to the county if the owner or operator fails to report when required or pay the tax when due not later than the fourth anniversary of the date the tax becomes due. The bill exempts a county from this deadline and authorizes a county to bring such a suit at any time if, with intent to evade the tax, the person files a false or fraudulent report with the county or if the person has not filed a report for the tax with the county.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1724 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|