BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1856 |
By: Burkett |
Homeland Security & Public Safety |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
It has been reported that peace officers transporting a patient with a mental illness from an emergency room or general hospital to a mental health facility are often asked to obtain medical clearance from the originating facility prior to transport or from the receiving mental health facility upon delivery of the patient. Interested parties note that obtaining a medical clearance, which can be as extensive as a full physical, can be time consuming for law enforcement and inefficient for both the entities covering the costs, such as counties, and the individuals with mental illness who are in dire need of immediate care. In addition, the parties note that medical clearance examinations for patients with no signs of physical fragility waste valuable hospital and law enforcement resources, as well as delay transfer and treatment of individuals, and that the attorney general has issued an opinion providing that medical clearance decisions should be left to the detaining officer's discretion. C.S.H.B. 1856 seeks to address these issues by prohibiting a mental health facility from requiring a medical evaluation before a peace officer transports certain persons to the facility.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1856 amends the Health and Safety Code to prohibit a mental health facility to which a peace officer transports a person taken into custody for emergency detention without a warrant due to the person's mental illness from requiring the peace officer to transport the person taken into custody to a medical facility to receive a medical evaluation before the peace officer transports the person to the mental health facility.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1856 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|