BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1994 |
By: Reynolds |
Technology |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Current law grants the Department of Information Resources (DIR) the authority to adopt rules requiring all state agencies other than institutions of higher education to purchase information technology commodity items using contracts developed by DIR. If DIR does not have the commodity item on an existing contract, an agency must request an exemption in writing and may not proceed until DIR responds. Interested parties note that, following an exemption granted by DIR, the state agency must undergo a procurement process that can take at least six weeks and that the need for such exemptions increases as the scope and rate of change in the technology industry outpaces DIR's ability to keep needed items on contract, since DIR's contract process may take as long as two years to award a contract. Interested parties contend that the technology industry is too broad and develops too rapidly for DIR to maintain all necessary commodity items on contract. C.S.H.B. 1994 seeks to make the procurement of information technology commodity items more efficient for state agencies by allowing such agencies to procure needed commodity items using a local government cooperative contract.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1994 amends the Government Code to exempt a state agency from Department of Information Resources (DIR) rules requiring a state agency to purchase an information technology commodity item in accordance with a contract developed by DIR if DIR certifies in writing that the commodity item is not available for purchase under an existing DIR-developed contract and to authorize an agency, under such exemption, to purchase a commodity item through a contract developed by a local government purchasing cooperative.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1994 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|