BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2080 |
By: Thompson, Senfronia |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
As part of its ongoing revision of Texas probate, guardianship, and trust law, the Real Estate, Probate, and Trust Law Section of the State Bar of Texas has proposed several changes affecting guardianships. C.S.H.B. 2080 seeks to enact those changes.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2080 amends the Estates Code, as effective January 1, 2014, to specify that, at the expiration of the 10-day period prescribed for serving notice of intention to take depositions in certain probate matters, the depositions for which the notice was posted may be taken, rather than specifying that commission may issue for taking the depositions at the expiration of that period.
C.S.H.B. 2080 requires a court clerk to collect a filing fee, including a deposit for payment to an attorney ad litem, required by law to be paid on the filing of certain documents in a guardianship matter from the person or entity filing the documents. The bill exempts a guardian, an attorney ad litem, a guardian ad litem, a person or entity who files an affidavit of inability to pay, a guardianship program, a governmental entity, and a government agency or nonprofit agency providing guardianship services from a requirement to pay a fee on the filing of such documents. The bill entitles a person or entity, after the creation of a guardianship, to be reimbursed for such a filing fee, except for a deposit for payment to an attorney ad litem, from the guardianship estate or, if the guardianship estate is insufficient to pay the amount of the filing fee, the county treasury.
C.S.H.B. 2080 authorizes a court, on request by a person protected by a protective order or a guardian, attorney ad litem, or member of the family or household of a person protected by an order, to exclude certain specified information relating to the protected person from any document filed in a guardianship proceeding. The bill requires the court, on granting such a request for confidentiality, to order the clerk to strike the information from the public records of the court and to maintain a confidential record of the information for use only by the court. The bill exempts a guardianship proceeding from certain rules of civil procedure relating to claims for relief and expedited actions.
C.S.H.B. 2080 authorizes a court to appoint an attorney ad litem in any guardianship proceeding to represent the interests of an incapacitated person or another person who has a legal disability, a proposed ward, a nonresident, an unborn or unascertained person, or an unknown or missing potential heir, except in a situation in which the appointment is required. The bill entitles an attorney ad litem appointed under this provision to reasonable compensation for services provided in the amount set by the court, to be taxed as costs in the proceeding.
C.S.H.B. 2080 authorizes a court to refer a contested guardianship proceeding to mediation on the written agreement of the parties or on the court's own motion. The bill establishes that a mediated settlement agreement is binding on the parties if the agreement provides in a specified manner that the agreement is not subject to revocation by the parties, if the agreement is signed by each party to the agreement, and if the agreement is signed by the party's attorney, if any, who is present at the time the agreement is signed. The bill entitles a party to judgment on a mediated settlement agreement that meets such requirements. The bill creates an exception to that entitlement by authorizing a court to decline to enter a judgment on a mediated settlement agreement if the court finds that the agreement is not in the ward's or proposed ward's best interests.
C.S.H.B. 2080 authorizes an application for appointment of a guardian to omit the address of a person named in the application if the application states that the person is protected by a protective order; if a copy of the protective order is attached to the application as an exhibit; if the application states the county in which the person resides; if the application indicates the place where notice to or the issuance and service of citation on the person may be made or sent; and if the application is accompanied by a request for a court order specifying the manner of issuance, service, and return of citation or notice on the person.
C.S.H.B. 2080 requires an order appointing a guardian with full authority over a ward's person or over both a ward's person and estate to specify the right of the guardian to have physical possession of the ward and to establish the ward's legal domicile. The bill requires such an order, or an order appointing a guardian with limited authority that includes the right of the guardian to have physical possession of the ward or to establish the ward's legal domicile, to also contain a prominently displayed statement relating to a peace officer's enforcement of that right. The bill prescribes the form and content of the required statement.
C.S.H.B. 2080 sets the nonrefundable fee accompanying an application for a certificate of registration as a private professional guardian at $40, rather than at an amount set by the clerk of the county having venue over the proceeding for the appointment of a guardian. The bill exempts the change in the amount of the fee from Government Code provisions relating to the implementation of new or amended court costs and fees.
C.S.H.B. 2080 expands the presumption that it is not in the best interests of a ward or incapacitated person to appoint as guardian of the ward or incapacitated person a person who has been finally convicted of certain offenses by adding terroristic threat or continuous violence against the family of the ward or incapacitated person to those offenses to which the presumption applies. The bill prohibits the appointment of a person found to have committed family violence who is subject to a protective order as guardian of a proposed ward or ward who is protected by the protective order.
C.S.H.B. 2080 grants a guardian of the person of a ward the power to sign documents necessary or appropriate to facilitate employment of the ward if the guardian was appointed with full authority over the ward's person or if the power is specified in the court order appointing the guardian with limited powers over the ward's person.
C.S.H.B. 2080 adds as a condition on the authority of a court that creates a guardianship or management trust to authorize the payment of certain reasonable and necessary attorney's fees the condition that the fees be in amounts the court considers equitable and just. The bill authorizes a court, if the court finds that a party in a guardianship proceeding acted in bad faith or without just cause in prosecuting or objecting to an application in the proceeding, to require the party to reimburse the ward's estate for all or part of the attorney's fees awarded by the court. The bill requires the court to issue judgment against the party and in favor of the estate for the amount of attorney's fees required to be reimbursed to the estate.
C.S.H.B. 2080 revises a provision relating to the costs of a proceeding generally to specify that the court costs of a guardianship proceeding that are paid out of the guardianship estate, or out of the county treasury if the estate is insufficient to pay the cost, include the cost of the attorneys ad litem, mental health professionals, and interpreters appointed in the proceeding, in addition to the cost of guardians ad litem or a court visitor. The bill requires the costs attributable to the services of such persons to be paid at any time after the commencement of the guardianship proceeding as ordered by the court and requires the court costs of a guardianship proceeding to be set in an amount the court considers equitable and just. The bill repeals provisions governing compensation for attorneys, mental health professionals, and interpreters appointed in a guardianship proceeding.
C.S.H.B. 2080 authorizes a court, if the court finds that a party in a guardianship proceeding acted in bad faith or without just cause in prosecuting or objecting to an application in the proceeding, to order the party to pay all or part of the costs of the proceeding. The bill requires the court, if the party found to be acting in bad faith or without just cause was required to provide security for the probable costs of the proceeding, to first apply the amount provided as security as payment for costs ordered by the court. The bill requires the court, if the amount provided as security is insufficient to pay the entire amount ordered by the court, to render judgment in favor of the estate against the party for the remaining amount. The bill removes a provision requiring an applicant for the appointment of a guardian to pay the cost of the proceeding if the court denies the application based on the recommendation of a court investigator.
C.S.H.B. 2080 expands the contents of the affidavit required to be attached by the guardian of a ward's estate to an annual account regarding changes in the estate assets and the contents of the sworn affidavit required to be filed annually by the guardian of a ward's person to include, if the guardian is a private professional guardian, a guardianship program, or the Department of Aging and Disability Services, a statement indicating whether the guardian or an individual certified by the Guardianship Certification Board, who is providing guardianship services to the ward and who is swearing to the account or affidavit on the guardian's behalf, is or has been the subject of an investigation conducted by the Guardianship Certification Board during the accounting period or preceding year, as applicable.
C.S.H.B. 2080 authorizes a guardian of the person of a ward who files the guardian's annual report electronically with the court to use an unsworn declaration instead of a written sworn declaration or affidavit required under statutory provisions relating to that report. The bill requires the unsworn declaration to be in writing and subscribed by the person making the declaration as true under penalty of perjury. The bill sets out the form of such an unsworn declaration and prohibits the use of an unsworn declaration in the form prescribed under the Civil Practice and Remedies Code instead of a written sworn declaration or affidavit for such purposes.
C.S.H.B. 2080 creates an exception to the requirement that a court appoint an attorney ad litem to represent the interests of an alleged incapacitated person in a hearing to determine incapacity with respect to the creation of a management trust by establishing that, if an application for the creation of a trust is filed by a person who has only a physical disability, the court is authorized, but not required, to appoint an attorney ad litem to represent the interests of the person in the hearing to determine incapacity. The bill creates an exception to the requirement that a court appoint a financial institution to serve as trustee of a management trust if the management trust is created for a person who has only a physical disability.
C.S.H.B. 2080 establishes that a trustee of a management trust created for a person who has only a physical disability serves without giving a bond. The bill requires a management trust created for a person who has only a physical disability to provide for that fact and to provide that the trustee of the trust serves without giving a bond and is entitled to receive, without the court's approval, reasonable compensation for services the trustee provides to the person as the person's trustee. The bill requires the compensation of a trustee of a management trust created for a ward or incapacitated person to be determined, paid, reduced, and eliminated in the same manner as compensation of a guardian, rather than in the same manner as compensation of a guardian of an estate.
C.S.H.B. 2080 authorizes a court creating or modifying a management trust to omit or modify any of the required terms applicable to the trust if the court determines that the omission or modification is necessary and appropriate for the person for whom the trust is created to be eligible to receive certain public benefits or assistance or is in the person's best interests, rather than authorizing the court to omit or modify only certain specified terms if the court determines that both of those circumstances exist. The bill authorizes such a court to omit or modify any of the required terms applicable to the trust if the court is creating the trust for a person who has only a physical disability and authorizes such omission or modification if the court determines that such action is necessary and appropriate for the person for whom the trust is created to be eligible to receive certain public benefits or assistance or is in the person's best interests.
C.S.H.B. 2080 limits the requirement that the trustee of a management trust prepare and file with the court an annual accounting of transactions in the trust to the trustee of a management trust created for a ward and clarifies that the trustee is required to prepare and file the accounting in the same manner and form that is required of a guardian of the estate, rather than that required of a guardian.
C.S.H.B. 2080 authorizes a court, for the purposes of a proceeding to determine whether to transfer property from a management trust to a pooled trust subaccount, to appoint an attorney ad litem or guardian ad litem to represent the interests of a person who has only a physical disability for whom the management trust was created.
C.S.H.B. 2080 repeals a statutory provision relating to the transmission of files by a clerk with respect to a guardianship proceeding for which the proper venue is finally determined to be in another county, notwithstanding the provision's transfer and reenactment by previously enacted legislation.
C.S.H.B. 2080 repeals Section 1155.051, Estates Code, as effective January 1, 2014, and Section 631, Texas Probate Code.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
Except as otherwise provided, January 1, 2014.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2080 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|