BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2111 |
By: Strama |
Human Services |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The transitional living services program was established to prepare youth living in foster care for independent living, and training in certain practical activities is required for certain youth. The transient nature of foster care can result in inconsistent eating habits and may leave foster children with a lack of knowledge about food preparation and cooking. In addition, foster children may not have access to reliable nutrition information. Among other provisions, C.S.H.B. 2111 seeks to add training in food preparation and nutrition education that promotes healthy food choices to the transitional living services program.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2111 amends the Family Code to require, rather than authorize, that the experiential life-skills training a foster care provider is required to provide or assist youth who are age 14 or older in obtaining include training in certain practical activities. The bill adds the condition that training for the practical activity of using public transportation is included among those activities when it is appropriate. The bill includes services that will assist youth in developing skills in food preparation and nutrition education that promotes healthy food choices among the services a person with whom the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) contracts for transitional living services for foster youth is required to provide or assist youth in obtaining. The bill requires an entity with which DFPS contracts for transitional living services for foster youth, when appropriate, to partner with a community-based organization to assist the entity in providing the transitional living services.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2111 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|