BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2124 |
By: Thompson, Senfronia |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Recently enacted legislation allowed the principal of a medical power of attorney to sign the medical power of attorney and have the signature acknowledged before a notary public in lieu of signing in the presence of two qualifying witnesses. However, interested parties observe that the current form of a medical power of attorney still requires the form to be signed in the presence of two competent adult witnesses in order to be valid. C.S.H.B. 2124 seeks to amend the form of a medical power of attorney to conform to the recently enacted legislation and also addresses the venue for an action to revoke a medical power of attorney.
|
||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2124 amends the Health and Safety Code to change the form of a medical power of attorney and the form of the disclosure statement regarding medical power of attorney, effective January 1, 2014, to provide the principal the option of signing the medical power of attorney form and have the signature acknowledged before a notary public as an alternative to signing the form in the presence of two competent adult witnesses and to inform the principal of that option in the related disclosure statement, respectively. The bill clarifies in the disclosure statement that the form must be signed by the principal. Effective January 1, 2014, when the changes to the medical power of attorney form take effect, the bill establishes that the changes to statutory provisions prescribing such form do not affect the validity of a document executed under those provisions before that date. The bill requires the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission to adopt the forms necessary to comply with the changes made under the bill's provisions not later than October 1, 2013.
C.S.H.B. 2124 requires a civil action relating to the revocation of a medical power of attorney to be brought in district court only in a county in which there is no statutory probate court. The bill establishes that in a county in which there is a statutory probate court, the statutory probate court and the district court have concurrent jurisdiction over such an action.
|
||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
Except as otherwise provided, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2124 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|