BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2150 |
By: Nevárez |
Culture, Recreation & Tourism |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
It has been reported that historical and archaeological findings confirm that elk were a native species to Texas before being hunted out of existence before the 20th century and that evidence including eye witnesses, elk bones and antlers, Native American photographs, and a petroglyph of an elk supports the theory that elk were in fact once widespread across the state. Interested parties have raised concerns that state law is ambiguous as it regards the species classification of elk. C.S.H.B. 2150 seeks to address this concern and others by clarifying that elk are indigenous to Texas while exempting the species from statutory provisions relating to nongame species.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2150 amends the Parks and Wildlife Code to remove elk from the types of animals that are classified as exotic animals for purposes of statutory provisions relating to permits for the management of wildlife and exotic animals using aircraft and statutory provisions relating to hunting and possession of exotic animals. The bill excludes elk from statutory provisions relating to the management and regulation of nongame species.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2150 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|