BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2280 |
By: Phillips |
Licensing & Administrative Procedures |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Under current law, a person is prohibited from being employed by a licensed surety if that person has been convicted of a misdemeanor offense involving moral turpitude or of a felony in the preceding 10 years. However, interested parties contend that there is some ambiguity as to the legality of such a person working for an attorney who acts as a surety because an attorney is not required to be licensed as a surety in order to engage in bail bonding business. The goal of C.S.H.B. 2280 is to clarify this ambiguity.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2280 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to prohibit a surety, including an attorney acting as a surety, from employing or contracting with a person to act as an agent for the surety if the person has been finally convicted of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or a felony.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2280 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|