BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2748 |
By: Lewis |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Recent events have provided evidence for the assertion that there is insufficient due process for landowners seeking to determine whether a pipeline holds common carrier status and therefore has the power of eminent domain. It is argued that there should be a process that provides for more rigorous review to ensure that pipeline operators seeking common carrier status satisfy the statutory definition of a common carrier. In order to determine whether a pipeline company meets the statutory definition of a common carrier, C.S.H.B. 2748 seeks to establish procedures for making such a determination that involve notice, hearing or administrative review, and an opportunity to appeal.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Railroad Commission of Texas in SECTION 2 of this bill.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2748 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code and the Natural Resources Code to establish that a permit to operate in Texas as a common carrier issued under the bill's provisions is a conclusive determination that the permit holder is a common carrier for the purposes of a judicial proceeding, other than an appeal of an order approving or denying an application for such a permit.
C.S.H.B. 2748 amends the Natural Resources Code to establish that a person who owns, operates, or manages a pipeline is not conclusively determined to be a common carrier, as defined by state law, for the purposes of a judicial proceeding unless the person holds a permit issued under the bill's provisions. The bill requires a permit to operate a pipeline issued by the Railroad Commission of Texas that does not comply with the bill's provisions governing a determination of common carrier status to state that the railroad commission has not made a conclusive determination of that status for the permit holder.
C.S.H.B. 2748 requires a person who owns, operates, or manages a pipeline and who seeks a conclusive determination that the person is a common carrier for purposes of a judicial proceeding to submit to the railroad commission an application for the determination on a form specified by the railroad commission that includes evidence required by the railroad commission to show that the applicant qualifies as a common carrier. The bill requires such an application to be accompanied by a reasonable fee established by railroad commission rule to cover the costs of administering the bill's provisions and caps the fee at $2,500. The bill requires the railroad commission to provide to the applicant notice that the railroad commission has received the application and to include with the notice a proposed location, date, and time for a hearing on the application. The bill requires the proposed hearing date to be not earlier than the 35th day and not later than the 56th day after the date the railroad commission sends the notice.
C.S.H.B. 2748 requires the applicant for a determination of common carrier status, after the railroad commission provides such notice, to publish notice of the application for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in each county in which a portion of the pipeline may be located, to mail or deliver notice of the application to the county clerk or municipal secretary of each county and municipality in which a portion of the pipeline may be located not later than the last day of the newspaper publication, to provide Internet access to the text of the application if no other entity provides the access not later than the last day of the newspaper publication, and to file with the railroad commission proof of compliance with the newspaper publication requirement and an affidavit attesting that the applicant has complied with the requirements to notify certain county clerks or municipal secretaries and to provide Internet access to the text of the application under certain conditions. The bill requires the notice of application to include the proposed location, date, and time of the hearing on the application, a statement that the proposed location, date, and time are subject to change, and a statement that a person may contact the railroad commission to determine whether the proposed location, date, or time has been changed; a description of the point of origin and point of destination of the pipeline; a list of each county and municipality in which a portion of the pipeline may be located; the Internet address at which the text of the application can be viewed; a description of the procedure for protesting the application, including the protest deadline under the bill's provisions; and a statement that the purpose of the hearing is to determine whether the applicant is a common carrier, as defined by state law, and not to determine the route of the proposed pipeline.
C.S.H.B. 2748 authorizes a person to file a protest with the railroad commission of a submitted application if the person owns land in a county in which a portion of the pipeline may be located, if the person is a county or municipality in which a portion of the pipeline may be located, or if the person is a railroad commission staff member. The bill requires such a protest to be filed not later than the 21st day after the last day of the required newspaper publication of the notice of application.
C.S.H.B. 2748 requires the railroad commission to designate a hearings examiner to review applications without a hearing and to conduct hearings on applications. The bill authorizes the hearings examiner to review an application without a hearing if the railroad commission does not receive a protest of the application before the deadline, if railroad commission staff have reviewed the application and stipulated that there are no disputed issues of fact or law regarding the application, and if the hearings examiner finds that a hearing is unnecessary and that administrative review is warranted. The bill requires the hearings examiner, if such conditions do not apply, to hold a hearing on the application at the proposed location, date, and time specified in the notice provided to the applicant by the railroad commission, unless the applicant publishes the newspaper notice for two consecutive weeks the last day of which falls on a day that is less than 21 days before the proposed hearing date, in which case the hearings examiner is required to hold the hearing on a date that is at least 21 days after the last day of the newspaper publication. The bill requires the railroad commission to provide notice of the hearing location, date, and time to the applicant and each person who filed a protest of the application. The bill establishes that the purpose of the hearing is to determine whether the applicant is a common carrier and not to determine the route of the proposed pipeline.
C.S.H.B. 2748 authorizes the railroad commission to approve an application and issue a permit to the applicant to operate in Texas as a common carrier if the railroad commission finds after administrative review or a hearing that the applicant is a common carrier, as defined by state law. The bill requires the hearings examiner to issue to the railroad commission a recommended order or proposal for decision, as applicable, containing findings of fact and conclusions of law and requires the railroad commission to issue an order approving or denying the application. For an application reviewed without a hearing under the bill's provisions, the bill establishes a deadline of not later than the 40th day after the last day of the newspaper publication required by the bill's provisions by which the hearings examiner is required to issue the recommended order to the railroad commission and by which the railroad commission is required to issue an order approving or denying the application. For an application for which a hearing is held under the bill's provisions, the bill establishes a deadline of not later than the 40th day after the last day of the hearing by which the hearings examiner is required to issue the proposal for decision to the railroad commission and by which the railroad commission is required to issue an order approving or denying the application. The bill requires the commission order to include a statement of findings of fact that includes the substance of the evidence presented at a hearing and conclusions of law that support the decision. The bill authorizes the railroad commission to adopt, wholly or partly, or modify the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the proposal for decision. The bill authorizes a person to appeal a railroad commission order approving or denying an application that is reviewed without a hearing in the manner provided for judicial review of contested cases under the Administrative Procedure Act.
C.S.H.B. 2748 authorizes the railroad commission to extend certain deadlines prescribed by the bill's provisions for good cause and to adopt rules as necessary to implement the bill's provisions.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2748 may differ from the engrossed version in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|