BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2931 |
By: Capriglione |
Elections |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that presiding election judges currently have the authority to remove an alternate presiding judge, an election clerk, or an election watcher from a polling place for any reason without having to show that the judge, clerk, or watcher violated any election law. Noting that alternate presiding judges, election clerks, and election watchers are necessarily political positions and can be targeted by a presiding election judge from the opposite political party, the parties point out that the current law makes it both convenient and politically expedient for a judge to have such a judge, clerk, or watcher removed without any checks or balances on the presiding judge's authority. To address this issue, C.S.H.B. 2931 seeks to place limitations on the removal of an alternate presiding judge, election clerk, or election watcher from a polling place.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2931 amends the Election Code to prohibit a presiding election judge from removing an alternate presiding judge, an election clerk, or a person appointed to observe or watch the conduct of an election on behalf of a candidate, a political party, or the proponents or opponents of a measure from a polling place unless the presiding judge believes that the alternate presiding judge, election clerk, or watcher has violated a law and has communicated to that person, in a written and signed document, the specific law the presiding judge believes the person violated or unless the removal is pursuant to an arrest warrant issued by the presiding election judge. The bill requires the a presiding judge, as soon as possible after such a removal, to inform the county clerk, county elections administrator, or similar official administering the election for a political subdivision of the removal.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2931 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|