BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2953 |
By: Guillen |
Licensing & Administrative Procedures |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties have raised concerns regarding a recent trend among municipalities to adopt ordinances that impose additional restrictions and regulations on the business activities of persons and entities who have been granted a license by the state to practice their professions or conduct their business within the state. The parties note that these additional restrictions and regulations vary widely between municipalities, resulting in a lack of consistency in occupational regulation throughout the state. Many state license holders who are also regulated by municipalities assert that the authority granted to them by the state to practice their profession or legally conduct business is effectively taken away through this additional layer of regulation by municipalities. C.S.H.B. 2953 seeks to remedy these issues by providing more consistency in statewide occupational regulation.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2953 amends the Local Government Code to prohibit the governing body of a municipality from adopting or enforcing an ordinance, rule, or regulation that establishes requirements for, imposes restrictions on, or otherwise regulates the activity of a state license holder within the municipality or the municipality's extraterritorial jurisdiction, except a zoning ordinance, a commercial building regulation, a sexually oriented business regulation, a fire code, an electrical code, a plumbing code, or an ordinance or regulation concerning wages, benefits, workplace safety, or working conditions. The bill specifies that a municipal ordinance, rule, or regulation that violates this provision is void and unenforceable.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2953 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|