BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3030 |
By: Fletcher |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties report an exorbitant amount of uncollected payments for issued misdemeanor warrants and capias pro fine warrants in Texas and assert that more efficient mechanisms for collecting payment on these uncollected costs will result in more revenue for counties and municipalities. C.S.H.B. 3030 seeks to provide offenders alleged to have committed certain misdemeanors or with capias pro fine warrants the opportunity to pay the associated court or warrant costs with a valid credit card or debit card and thereby avoid arrest.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3030 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a court to adopt an alternative procedure for collecting an outstanding fine or court cost associated with the alleged commission of a Class C misdemeanor by a defendant or a judgment for fines and court costs of a defendant convicted of any offense, if a capias pro fine has been issued in the case. The bill, under this alternative payment procedure, requires a peace officer making an arrest of a defendant to inform the arrested person of the possibility of making an immediate payment of the fine and related court costs by use of a credit or debit card and of the arrested person's available alternatives to making such an immediate payment, and authorizes the peace officer, on behalf of the court, to accept the person's immediate payment of the fine and related court costs by use of a credit or debit card. The bill requires the peace officer to release the person after accepting such immediate payment on behalf of the court.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3030 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|