BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3193 |
By: Otto |
Ways & Means |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Current law allows certain property owners to appeal an appraisal review board order through binding arbitration as an alternative to filing a lawsuit and allows those property owners to choose between a full arbitration process and an expedited arbitration process. Interested parties contend that, as a result of expedited arbitration at a reduced rate, the available pool of qualified arbitrators has declined dramatically while the total number of arbitrations has increased dramatically. C.S.H.B. 3193 seeks to ensure that quality arbitrators are available for binding arbitration in the future.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3193 repeals Section 41A.031, Tax Code, providing for an expedited arbitration of a property owner's appeal of an appraisal review board order determining a protest concerning the appraised or market value of the owner's property.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
January 1, 2014.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3193 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|