BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3201 |
By: Kolkhorst |
Public Health |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties report that the State Board of Dental Examiners has had difficulty investigating complaints and resolving issues in a timely manner due to a lack of funds and qualified reviewers and to inefficient reviewing and enforcement processes, which limit the board's ability to handle complaints. The parties also assert that clear direction regarding dental complaint processing and investigation is needed. C.S.H.B. 3201 seeks to strengthen the board's authority and enforcement powers, improve complaint review and resolution processes, and increase the board's funds to provide for more employees to improve the response to complaints and potential fraud.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the State Board of Dental Examiners in SECTIONS 4, 6, and 7 of this bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3201 amends the Occupations Code to require the State Board of Dental Examiners to collect an $80 surcharge for each fee collected for the issuance of a license and for a license renewal. The bill requires the board to deposit each surcharge collected to the credit of the dental public assurance account, which is an account in the general revenue fund dedicated to the board to pay for the board's enforcement program, including the expert panel.
C.S.H.B. 3201 removes a provision restricting disclosure of investigation files and other confidential records of the board to the persons investigated at the completion of the investigation, and instead, as an exception to the confidentiality of such files and records, requires the board to inform the license holder of the specific allegations against the license holder.
C.S.H.B. 3201 removes a provision requiring the board to investigate a complaint received under the Dental Practice Act over which the board has jurisdiction to determine the facts concerning the complaint, and instead requires the board to complete a preliminary investigation of such a complaint not later than the 45th day after the date of receiving the complaint. The bill requires the board to first determine whether the license holder constitutes a continuing threat to the public welfare and, on completion of such a determination, to determine whether to officially proceed on the complaint. The bill establishes that if the board fails to complete the preliminary investigation in the time required, the board's official investigation of the complaint is considered to start on that date. The bill removes a requirement that the procedures by which a board employee may dismiss a complaint if the investigation does not reveal a violation require a board employee to consult with a dentist member of the board before dismissing a complaint relating to patient morbidity, professional conduct, or quality of care.
C.S.H.B. 3201 authorizes the board by rule to provide for expert panels appointed by the board to assist with complaints and investigations relating to professional competency by acting as expert dentist and dental hygienist reviewers and requires each member of the expert dentist panel and each member of the expert dentist hygienist panel to be licensed to practice dentistry or dental hygiene, as applicable, in Texas. The bill requires the rules adopted by the board to include provisions governing the panel's composition; qualifications for panel membership; length of time a member may serve on the panel; grounds for removal from the panel; the avoidance of conflicts of interest, including situations in which the affected license holder and the panel member live or work in the same geographical area or are competitors; and the panel's duties. The bill requires the board's rules governing grounds for removal from the panel to include providing for the removal of a panel member who is repeatedly delinquent in reviewing complaints and in submitting reports to the board. The bill requires a complaint, if the preliminary investigation of that complaint indicates that an act by a license holder falls below an acceptable standard of care, to be reviewed by an authorized expert panel consisting of license holders who practice in the same specialty as the license holder who is the subject of the complaint or in another specialty that is similar to the license holder's specialty.
C.S.H.B. 3201 requires the expert panel to report in writing the panel's determinations based on the review of the complaint and requires the report to specify the standard of care that applies to the facts that are the basis of the complaint and the clinical basis for the panel's determinations, including any reliance on peer-reviewed journals, studies, or reports. The bill establishes procedures by which a complaint may be reviewed by a series of expert license holder reviewers and requirements for issuing a final written report on the matter. The bill authorizes the expert reviewers assigned to examine a complaint to consult and communicate with each other about the complaint in formulating their opinions and reports.
C.S.H.B. 3201 authorizes the board to delegate authority to board employees to issue licenses under the Dental Practice Act to applicants who clearly meet all licensing requirements and requires an application to be returned to the board if the board employees determine that the applicant does not clearly meet all licensing requirements. The bill establishes that a license issued by board employees does not require formal board approval. The bill authorizes the board to delegate to a committee of board employees the authority to dismiss or enter into an agreed settlement of a complaint that does not relate directly to patient care or that involves only administrative violations. The bill requires the disposition determined by the committee to be approved by the board at a public meeting and requires such a complaint delegated to a committee to be referred for informal proceedings if the committee of employees determines that the complaint should not be dismissed or settled, the committee is unable to reach an agreed settlement, or the affected license holder requests that the complaint be referred for informal proceedings.
C.S.H.B. 3201 requires notice of the time and place of an informal settlement conference, if such a conference will be held to resolve a complaint, to be given to the license holder not later than the 45th day before the date the informal settlement conference is held, and to be accompanied by a written statement of the specific allegations against the license holder and the information the board intends to use at the informal settlement conference. The bill authorizes a license holder, if the board does not provide the statement or information when the notice is provided, to use that failure as grounds for rescheduling the informal settlement conference. The bill requires the license holder to provide to the board the license holder's rebuttal not later than the 15th day before the date of the settlement conference in order for that information to be considered at the conference. The bill requires the board to make a recording of the informal settlement conference on request by a license holder under review and establishes that the recording is a part of the investigative file and may not be released to a third party unless authorized by the Dental Practice Act. The bill authorizes the board to charge a license holder a fee to cover the cost of recording the settlement conference and requires the board to provide a copy of the recording to the license holder on the license holder's request.
C.S.H.B. 3201 authorizes the board to issue and establish the terms of a remedial plan to resolve the investigation of a complaint filed under the Dental Practice Act. The bill prohibits a remedial plan from containing a provision that revokes, suspends, limits, or restricts a person's license or other authorization to practice dentistry or dental hygiene or that assesses an administrative penalty against a person. The bill prohibits a remedial plan from being imposed to resolve a complaint concerning a patient death, the commission of a felony, or a matter in which the license holder engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior or contact with a patient or became financially or personally involved with a patient in an inappropriate manner, or from being imposed to resolve a complaint in which the appropriate resolution may involve a restriction on the manner in which a license holder practices dentistry or dental hygiene. The bill prohibits the board from issuing a remedial plan to resolve a complaint against a license holder if the license holder has previously entered into a remedial plan with the board for the resolution of a different complaint filed under the Dental Practice Act, and authorizes the board to assess a fee against a license holder participating in a remedial plan in an amount necessary to recover the costs of administering the plan. The bill establishes that a remedial plan is public information and that, in civil litigation, a remedial plan is a settlement agreement under Texas Rules of Evidence. The bill requires the board to adopt rules necessary to implement the bill's provisions relating to remedial plans.
C.S.H.B. 3201, in a provision effective September 1, 2103, requires the board to adopt rules necessary to implement the bill's provisions not later than December 1, 2013. The bill applies its provisions relating to complaints and investigations only to the investigation and resolution of a complaint filed with the State Board of Dental Examiners on or after January 1, 2014.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
Except as otherwise provided, January 1, 2014.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3201 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|