BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3597 |
By: Burnam |
Energy Resources |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that the Railroad Commission of Texas is not currently required to provide certain notice to the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) of a permit to drill an oil or gas well and that this lack of communication between the state agencies can become an issue for planning transportation projects, as illustrated by a recent IH-35 expansion. The parties report that TxDOT had been planning to expand that portion of IH-35 for years, but natural gas wells that were in place at the time TxDOT intended to begin expansion forced TxDOT to rework its plans and instead expand into a historic neighborhood. C.S.H.B. 3597 seeks to prevent the occurrence of situations like this by establishing requirements relating to the issuance by the railroad commission of a permit to drill an oil or gas well in an easement or near an easement held by TxDOT.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Railroad Commission of Texas in SECTION 1 of this bill.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3597 amends the Natural Resources Code to require the Railroad Commission of Texas to adopt rules to require that an application for a permit to drill an oil or gas well include an affirmation as to whether or not the well is located within an easement held by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) or within 50 yards of an easement held by TxDOT. The bill requires the railroad commission to transmit to TxDOT an application that contains such an affirmation not later than the 14th day after the date the railroad commission receives the application. The bill establishes that its provisions do not grant to TxDOT any authority regarding the approval of an application for a permit to drill an oil or gas well.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3597 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|