BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3633 |
By: Canales |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Modern technology, and the use of smart phones in particular, has made it increasingly easy for jurors to search for, receive, and share with other jurors information about defendants and the crimes of which the defendants are accused, including information that is not presented at trial. However, current law requires appellate counsel for a defendant to show good cause to receive certain juror information, and courts have reportedly required this good cause to be based on sworn testimony or supportive evidence in the court record. Critics argue that jurors' inappropriate use of smart phones to find information about the case that is excluded from the court record does not fit the criteria of good cause under existing law. C.S.H.B. 3633 seeks to remedy this situation by providing an exception for counsel representing a defendant in a postconviction proceeding to access juror information collected by a court so that an appeal or habeas writ could be developed in cases where counsel has reason to believe that inappropriate juror behavior has occurred.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3633 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to create an exception to the prohibition against a court disclosing information collected by the court or a prosecuting attorney during jury selection about a juror to require a court to disclose, on written request, such confidential personal juror information that was collected by the court, including copies of any juror summons, to counsel representing a defendant in a postconviction proceeding. The bill does not require a showing of good cause for that disclosure. The bill does not authorize disclosure of such juror information that was collected by a prosecuting attorney.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3633 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|