BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3681 |
By: Smith |
Urban Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Current law does not allow state agencies to accept a bid or award a contract that includes proposed financial participation by a person who received compensation from the agency to participate in preparing the specifications or request for proposals on which the bid or contract is based, and the parties contend that local governments should adhere to a similar requirement. C.S.H.B. 3681 seeks to address this concern by amending the current law relating to the acceptance of bids for certain local government contracts.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3681 amends the Local Government Code to prohibit a local government subject to competitive bidding requirements from accepting a bid or awarding a contract for an improvement to real property that includes proposed financial participation by a person who received compensation from the local government to participate in preparing the specifications or request for proposals on which the bid or contract is based. The bill sets out a certification statement required to be included on such a bid or award. The bill authorizes the local government, if the local government determines that an individual or business entity holding a local government contract was ineligible to have the contract accepted or awarded, to immediately terminate the contract without further obligation to the vendor. The bill establishes that its provisions do not create a cause of action to contest a bid or award of a local government contract and do not prohibit a bidder or contract participant from providing free technical assistance to a local government. The bill exempts from its provisions a contract for professional services that constitute the practice of architecture or the practice of engineering.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3681 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|