BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3814 |
By: Carter |
Insurance |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties assert that current law does not allow insurance companies to offer accident and health insurance policies that insure losses sustained or contracted due to intoxication. Such parties contend that consumers should be permitted to purchase more inclusive insurance policies and that permitting insurance companies to make such offerings could offer more protection for victims of drunk drivers and drug-related car accidents. C.S.H.B. 3814 seeks to authorize insurance companies to create a new product offering that provides coverage for losses sustained due to an insured who is intoxicated or under the influence of a narcotic.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3814 amends the Insurance Code to prohibit an individual accident and health insurance policy that provides coverage for medical, hospital, and surgical expenses incurred by an insured from containing the prescribed provision stating that the insurer is not liable for any loss of the insured due to intoxication or the influence of any narcotic not administered on a physician's advice unless the insurer provides notice to the insured of the provision and gives the insured an option to purchase a rider or endorsement that provides coverage for any loss sustained or contracted in consequence of the insured's being intoxicated or under the influence of any narcotic, regardless of whether the narcotic is administered on the advice of a physician. The bill applies only to an individual accident and health insurance policy that is delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 2014.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3814 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|