BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3934 |
By: Riddle |
Natural Resources |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The North Harris County Regional Water Authority was created to provide certain groundwater and surface water services to provide sufficient water to future residents of the area. In order to carry out its duties, the authority has incurred a substantial amount of debt. The authority's revenue comes primarily from pumpage fees and from sales of surface water to certain districts. Interested parties assert that it is necessary to clarify the authority's ability to collect fees on water pumped from wells within the authority's jurisdiction in order to avoid substantial fee or rate increases. C.S.H.B. 3934 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3934 amends Section 4.03, Chapter 1029, Acts of the 76th Legislature, Regular Session, 1999, to authorize the North Harris County Regional Water Authority to impose a charge on the amount of water pumped on a well or class of wells located within the authority's boundaries that, on or after June 30, 2013, either ceases to be subject to a groundwater reduction requirement imposed by the Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence District or is no longer subject to the regulatory provisions, permitting requirements, or jurisdiction of the subsidence district. The bill establishes that the authority retains all rights, powers, privileges, authorities, duties, and functions that it had before the bill's effective date. The bill provides for the validation and confirmation of certain authority actions and proceedings taken before the bill's effective date.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3934 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|