BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 166 |
By: Deuell |
Technology |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Texas hospitals are currently permitted to use the electronic strip on a patient's driver's license to facilitate the patient's admission into their facilities; however, physicians and other health care providers are prohibited from this practice. Interested parties report that substantial resources have been expended at both the federal and state levels to develop and use electronic medical records, yet patients and providers are often still faced with paper systems during the check-in process.
The parties contend that health care providers should have the same ability as hospitals to use the electronic strip on a driver's license as a tool for admission, as it provides both the patient and provider with a better and more efficient method of maintaining medical records. C.S.S.B. 166 seeks to improve and streamline patients' access to their health care provider and to increase medical record efficiency and accuracy for health care providers, while maintaining the state and federal regulations currently governing health care providers with respect to privacy or data protection.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 166 amends the Transportation Code to exempt a health care provider from the prohibition against accessing, using, or compiling or maintaining a database of electronically readable information derived from a driver's license, commercial driver's license, or personal identification certificate. The bill applies statutory provisions regarding the use and transfer of such information by a hospital to a health care provider and the limitations on the use of such information by a hospital's business associate to a health care provider's business associate.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 166 may differ from the engrossed in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|