BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 392 |
By: West |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Currently, in an action in which a party to the litigation files a petition, motion, or other pleading challenging the constitutionality of a state statute, the court, which has generally been interpreted to mean the clerk of the court, is required to serve notice of the constitutional question and a copy of the petition, motion, or other pleading that raises the challenge on the attorney general if the attorney general is not a party to or counsel involved in the litigation. There is concern that this requirement places an obligation on clerks to determine whether a complaint rises to a constitutional challenge. C.S.S.B. 392 seeks to address this issue by amending current law relating to service of notice on the attorney general concerning legal challenges to the constitutionality of state statutes.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 392 amends the Government Code to require a party that files a petition, motion, or other pleading challenging the constitutionality of a Texas statute to file with the court in which the action is pending a form the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System is required to adopt that indicates which pleading should be served on the attorney general by the court. The bill requires the court to serve notice of the constitutional challenge, rather than notice of the constitutional question, on the attorney general if the attorney general is not a party to or counsel involved in the litigation and removes the requirement that the notice identify the statute in question, state the basis for the challenge, and specify the petition, motion, or other pleading that raises the challenge.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 392 may differ from the engrossed version in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|