BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.S.B. 1871 |
By: Estes |
Culture, Recreation & Tourism |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Under current law, present and former state officials who have been appointed by the governor and confirmed by the senate are eligible to be buried in the Texas State Cemetery if they have served at least 12 years in the office to which appointed. C.S.S.B. 1871 seeks to decrease the amount of time that such officials are required to serve in order to be eligible for burial in the State Cemetery and also seeks to authorize the removal, under certain conditions, of the cemetery dedication from certain land currently dedicated as part of the State Cemetery.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.S.B. 1871 amends the Government Code to establish that the property other than the property described as Lot No. 5, Division B, City of Austin, Travis County, Texas, that is dedicated for cemetery purposes as part of the State Cemetery is no longer so dedicated if, not later than December 31, 2013, the State Cemetery Committee makes an affirmative finding that the property is no longer needed for cemetery purposes and expressly consents by a majority vote of the committee to remove the dedication and the chair of the committee files in the deed records of Travis County and submits for publication in the Texas Register a document indicating that the dedication is removed.
C.S.S.B. 1871 decreases from 12 to 10 the minimum number of years that a former state official or a state official who dies in office who has been appointed by the governor and confirmed by the senate is required to have served in the office to which appointed in order to be eligible for burial in the State Cemetery.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2013.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.S.B. 1871 may differ from the engrossed version in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the engrossed and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|