By: Ratliff H.B. No. 2824
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to the Texas High Performance Schools Consortium.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Section 7.0561, Education Code, is amended by
  amending Subsections (a), (b), (d), and (j) and adding Subsections
  (k), (l), and (m) to read as follows:
         (a)  In this section:
               (1)  "College readiness standards" mean the college
  readiness standards established under Section 28.008 as part of the
  essential knowledge and skills of the foundation curriculum and
  assessed under Section 39.023.
               (2)  "Consortium" [, "consortium"] means the Texas High
  Performance Schools Consortium established under this section.
               (3)  "Participant campus" means a school district
  campus or open-enrollment charter school that has been selected for
  and is participating in the consortium.
               (4)  "Participant district" means a school district
  that has one or more campuses participating in the consortium.
         (b)  The Texas High Performance Schools Consortium is
  established to inform the governor, legislature, State Board of
  Education, and commissioner concerning methods for transforming
  public schools in this state by improving student learning through
  the development of innovative, next-generation learning standards
  and assessment and accountability systems.
         (d)  The number of students initially enrolled in
  participant campuses [consortium participants] may not be greater
  than a number equal to five percent of the total number of students
  enrolled in public schools in this state according to the most
  recent agency data. With approval of the commissioner, a
  participant district may add one or more district campuses to the
  consortium.
         (j)  With the assistance of the school districts and
  open-enrollment charter schools participating in the consortium,
  the commissioner shall submit reports concerning the performance
  and progress of the consortium to the governor, [and] the
  legislature, and the State Board of Education not later than
  December 1, 2012, not later than December 1, 2014, and not later
  than December 1, 2016 [2014].
               (1)  The report submitted not later than December 1,
  2012, must include any recommendation by the commissioner
  concerning legislative authorization for the commissioner to waive
  a prohibition, requirement, or restriction that applies to a
  [consortium] participant. That report must also include a plan for
  an effective and efficient accountability system for participant
  campuses and districts [consortium participants] that balances
  academic excellence and local values to inspire learning and, at
  the state level, contingent on any necessary waiver of federal law,
  may incorporate use of a stratified random sampling of students or
  other objective methodology to hold participant campuses and
  districts [consortium participants] accountable while attempting
  to reduce the number of state assessment instruments that are
  required to be administered to students. The commissioner shall
  seek a federal waiver, to any extent necessary, to prepare for
  implementation of the plan if enacted by the legislature.
               (2)  The report submitted not later than December 1,
  2014, must include an update on the effectiveness with which
  participant campuses are closing gaps in achievement on college
  readiness standards, an evaluation of teaching fewer,
  high-priority learning standards in depth, and any recommendations
  for legislation. The report must address the effectiveness of the
  use of methods, including focus on high-priority standards; digital
  learning, such as blended learning, personalized learning, flipped
  classrooms, adaptive learning, and virtual learning; the use of
  multiple assessments that provide more precise, useful, and timely
  information; and reliance on local control that enables greater
  community and parental involvement.
               (3)  The report submitted not later than December 1,
  2016, must include an update on the effectiveness with which
  participant campuses are addressing closing gaps in achievement on
  college readiness standards, an evaluation of teaching fewer,
  high-priority learning standards in depth, and any recommendations
  for legislation.
               (4)  This subsection expires January 1, 2018.
         (k)  At least annually, the school board or governing body of
  each participant district or open-enrollment charter school shall
  hold a public hearing to discuss its goals and work in the
  consortium and to provide for parental and community input.
         (l)  Notwithstanding Chapter 39 and any other law,
  participant campuses shall be evaluated for accountability
  purposes and shall administer assessments only as follows:
               (1)  beginning in the 2013-14 school year:
                     (A)  for all assessment instruments administered
  under this Subsection, participant campuses:
                           (i)  shall be evaluated on disaggregated
  data by student group, with an emphasis on closing achievement
  gaps; and
                           (ii)  shall be evaluated on a report-only
  basis and the scores shall not be otherwise used for accountability
  purposes, including interventions and sanctions under Subchapter
  E, Chapter 39;
                     (B)  for assessment instruments administered
  under Chapter 39, participant campuses shall be evaluated on
  college readiness standards only, to allow the schools to teach
  with depth and to evaluate the effects of teaching with depth;
                     (C)  students in grades three through eight who
  are not taking secondary-level courses shall be administered and
  students in grades three through eight who are taking
  secondary-level courses may, at the option of the district or
  charter school participating in the consortium, be administered
  assessment instruments prescribed by Section 39.023(a)(1), (2),
  and (5) only and may be administered ACT EXPLORE in eighth grade in
  lieu of the assessment instruments or may be administered fewer
  assessment instruments if allowed by federal law or a waiver of
  federal law; and
                     (D)  students taking secondary-level courses
  shall be assessed on end-of-course assessment instruments
  administered under Section 39.023(c) only for the tenth grade
  courses in English, math, and science in which they are currently
  enrolled or shall be assessed ACT PLAN for tenth grade in the same
  subjects if allowed under federal law, at the option of the district
  or open-enrollment charter school participating in the consortium;
               (2)  beginning in the 2014-15 school year or as soon as
  possible following receipt of a waiver from federal law or a change
  from the federal law that requires annual testing of every student:
                     (A)  students shall be administered:
                           (i)  assessment instruments under Section
  39.023(a) for reading in grade three, math in grade four, science in
  grade five, reading in grade six, and math in grade seven;
                           (ii)  in prekindergarten through twelfth
  grade, locally approved or developed assessments that are aligned
  to college readiness standards or high-priority learning standards
  identified in Subsection (f), that include limited numbers of state
  provided assessment items, and that have results that can be
  accessed by the agency for monitoring and reporting purposes, or
  other satisfactory secondary-level performance demonstrated under
  Section 39.025(h); and
                           (iii)  ACT EXPLORE at grade eight, ACT PLAN
  at grade ten, and ACT at grade eleven; and
                     (B)  participant campuses shall be evaluated on
  community established measures that include academic achievement
  and college and career readiness;
               (3)  beginning in the 2013-14 school year, students
  with disabilities shall be administered appropriate assessments
  including assessments, approved by the commissioner, that measure
  growth as determined by the student's individualized education
  program; and
               (4)  beginning in the 2013-14 school year, students of
  limited English proficiency:
                     (A)  shall be administered appropriate
  assessments including assessments, approved by the commissioner,
  that measure linguistic and academic growth as determined by the
  student's language proficiency assessment committee established by
  Section 29.063; and
                     (B)  if a waiver from federal law is obtained,
  shall participate in appropriate assessments the first five years
  in schools in the United States as participation only unless the
  student attains an English proficiency rating equivalent to
  advanced high performance during this time period, in which case
  the student's data will be aggregated into campus and district
  performance reports.
         (m)  The consortium shall receive independent evaluation
  from one or more external evaluation teams, including an
  institution of higher education in this state.
         SECTION 2.  Section 29.0822(a), Education Code, is amended
  to read as follows:
         (a)  Notwithstanding Section 25.081 or 25.082, a school
  district may apply to the commissioner to provide a flexible school
  day program for students who:
               (1)  have dropped out of school or are at risk of
  dropping out of school as defined by Section 29.081;
               (2)  attend a campus that is implementing an innovative
  redesign of the campus, including a campus in the high performance
  schools consortium under Section 7.0561, or an early college high
  school under a plan approved by the commissioner; or
               (3)  as a result of attendance requirements under
  Section 25.092, will be denied credit for one or more classes in
  which the students have been enrolled.
         SECTION 3.  Section 39.025(d), Education Code, is amended to
  read as follows:
         (d)  Notwithstanding Subsection (a), the commissioner by
  rule shall adopt one or more alternative nationally recognized norm
  referenced assessment instruments under this section to administer
  to a student to qualify for a high school diploma if the student
  enrolls after January 1 of the school year in which the student is
  otherwise eligible to graduate:
               (1)  for the first time in a public school in this
  state; [or]
               (2)  after an absence of at least four years from any
  public school in this state; or
               (3)  in a public school in this state that does not
  participate in the consortium under Section 7.0561 after the
  student has been enrolled in a school participating in the
  consortium during high school.
         SECTION 4.  If legislation does not pass in the 83rd Regular
  Session, Texas Legislature, in 2013, that allows substitute
  demonstrations of satisfactory secondary-level performance for
  students, Section 39.025, Education Code, is amended to add
  Subsection (h) as follows:
         (h)  A school district or open-enrollment charter school
  participating in the consortium established under Section 7.0561 by
  policy may allow a student who is enrolled in a participant campus
  and who demonstrates satisfactory secondary-level performance in a
  subject under this subsection to be exempt from the requirements
  that the student take an end-of-course assessment instrument in
  that subject and may allow a student who is enrolled in a
  participant campus to demonstrate satisfactory secondary-level
  performance in the manner described by this subsection in lieu of
  retaking an end-of-course assessment instrument. The district may
  allow the demonstration to substitute for a score required by this
  section or by any other law. The commissioner shall allow the
  demonstration to substitute as an indicator of student achievement
  under Section 39.053. A student's satisfactory secondary-level
  performance and student achievement level may be demonstrated by:
               (1)  satisfactory performance, at levels determined by
  the commissioner, on:
                     (A)  an advanced placement test;
                     (B)  an international baccalaureate examination;
                     (C)  an SAT Subject Test;
                     (D)  a Preliminary Scholastic Assessment Test
  (PSAT) assessment;
                     (E)  a preliminary American College Test (ACT)
  assessment; or
                     (F)  another assessment instrument determined by
  the commissioner to be at least as rigorous as an end-of-course
  assessment instrument adopted under Section 39.023(c); or
               (2)  successful completion of:
                     (A)  a dual-credit course;
                     (B)  an international baccalaureate course; or
                     (C)  an advanced placement course.
         SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
  a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
  provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
  Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
  Act takes effect September 1, 2013.