|
|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to the procedure for action by the Texas Commission on |
|
Environmental Quality on an application for a water right. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Subchapter D, Chapter 11, Water Code, is amended |
|
by adding Section 11.1281 to read as follows: |
|
Sec. 11.1281. TIME FOR PROCESSING APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS |
|
AND PERMIT AMENDMENTS FOR WATER RIGHTS. (a) In this section: |
|
(1) "Administratively complete" means the application |
|
includes the information required under Sections 11.124, 11.125, |
|
and 11.128 of this code and commission rules. If the application |
|
includes an agricultural use, the application must also include the |
|
information required by Sections 11.126 and 11.127 of this code. |
|
Submission of applicable water conservation and drought |
|
contingency plans under Sections 11.1271, 11.1272, and 11.1273 is |
|
also required, but the adequacy of these plans is not to be |
|
evaluated until the technical review of the application. |
|
(2) "Technical review" means the application review |
|
process performed after the executive director has determined the |
|
application is administratively complete, in which technical |
|
material is analyzed and reviewed in order to prepare a draft permit |
|
and draft notice based on the technical information associated with |
|
the application. |
|
(b) Within 30 working days of receipt of an application for |
|
a permit or permit amendment by the executive director, the |
|
executive director shall review the application and provide to the |
|
applicant: |
|
(1) written notice that the application is |
|
administratively complete; or |
|
(2) a written request for information detailing all |
|
information that must be provided for the application to be |
|
administratively complete. |
|
(c) The applicant has 30 days to submit a response to a |
|
request for information. Upon receipt of a timely response, within |
|
30 working days the executive director shall review the response |
|
and provide the applicant: |
|
(1) written notice that the application is |
|
administratively complete; or |
|
(2) a written request for information detailing all |
|
information that must be provided for the application to be deemed |
|
administratively complete. |
|
(d) For good cause, an applicant may request additional time |
|
to respond to a request for information and the Commission shall |
|
grant such request. The time periods specified in subsection (e) |
|
for determining the application to be administratively complete |
|
shall be abated for the additional period of time authorized by the |
|
Commission. |
|
(e) If an application has not been deemed administratively |
|
complete within 180 days of receipt of an application by the |
|
executive director, the executive director shall return the |
|
application, return all fees, and provide the applicant with a list |
|
of all deficiencies with the application. The applicant is entitled |
|
to appeal the return of the application and dispute the application |
|
deficiencies in a hearing before the commission. The commission |
|
will review the application, rule on the issues presented at the |
|
hearing, and issue an order: |
|
(1) returning the application, unless the applicant, |
|
within 30 days, or within an additional time period requested by the |
|
applicant and granted by the commission, provides the additional |
|
information the commission has determined is required to make the |
|
application administratively complete; or |
|
(2) declaring that the application is |
|
administratively complete with a time schedule for conducting the |
|
technical review of the application. |
|
(f) After an application is determined by the executive |
|
director to be administratively complete, the executive director |
|
shall commence a technical review of the application as necessary |
|
and appropriate. The technical review will continue for a period of |
|
time not to exceed 180 days. |
|
(g) During any time within the 180 day technical review |
|
period, if the executive director determines that additional |
|
technical information is required from the applicant, the executive |
|
director shall provide to the applicant a written request for such |
|
additional technical information. |
|
(h) The applicant has 30 days to submit a response to a |
|
request for technical information. Within 60 days following an |
|
applicant's timely response, the executive director shall review |
|
the response and provide the applicant: |
|
(1) the draft permit, draft notice, and technical |
|
memoranda associated with the application and written notice that |
|
the technical review is complete; or |
|
(2) written notice that the response to request for |
|
technical information was not adequate. |
|
(i) (1) For good cause, an applicant may request additional |
|
time to respond to a request for technical information and the |
|
Commission shall grant such request. The time periods specified |
|
herein for the technical review of the application shall be abated |
|
for the additional period of time authorized by the Commission. |
|
(2) For good cause, the executive director may, with |
|
notice to the applicant, extend the time to complete the technical |
|
review for 30 days. The executive director may not extend the time |
|
to complete the technical review more than three times. The time |
|
period specified herein for the commission's technical review of |
|
the application shall be abated for the additional period of time. |
|
(j) At the conclusion of the technical review period, the |
|
executive director shall provide the applicant with the draft |
|
permit, draft notice, and technical memoranda associated with the |
|
application and written notice that the technical review is |
|
complete. |
|
(k) If a response to a request for technical information is |
|
deemed not adequate by the executive director, the applicant and |
|
the executive director will have 180 days to collaborate in good |
|
faith efforts to resolve the inadequacy. If the executive director |
|
determines that the application is still inadequate at the end of |
|
this time period, the executive director shall return the |
|
application, return all fees, and provide the applicant with a list |
|
of all deficiencies with the application. The applicant is entitled |
|
to appeal the return of the application and dispute the application |
|
deficiencies in a hearing before the commission. The commission |
|
will review the application, rule on the issues presented at the |
|
hearing, and issue an order: |
|
(1) returning the application, unless the applicant, |
|
within 30 days, or within an additional time period requested by the |
|
applicant and granted by the commission, provides the additional |
|
information the commission has determined is required to complete |
|
the technical review; or |
|
(2) requiring the executive director to prepare the |
|
draft permit, draft notice, and technical memoranda associated with |
|
the application and written notice that the technical review is |
|
complete. |
|
(l) Not later than 14 days after receipt of the draft |
|
permit, draft notice, and technical memoranda associated with the |
|
application, the applicant shall provide to the executive director: |
|
(1) the applicant's comments to the draft permit, |
|
draft notice, and technical memoranda associated with the |
|
application; or |
|
(2) a statement that indicates that the applicant has |
|
no comments. |
|
(m) For good cause, an applicant may request additional time |
|
to provide comments to the draft permit, draft notice, and |
|
technical memoranda, and the Commission shall grant such request. |
|
The time periods specified herein for processing the application |
|
shall be abated for the additional period of time authorized by the |
|
Commission. |
|
(n) The executive director shall file the draft permit, |
|
draft notice, and technical memoranda with the chief clerk of the |
|
commission: |
|
(1) after 14 days if the applicant submits comments, |
|
during which time the executive director and the applicant shall |
|
collaborate to address the comments; or |
|
(2) immediately upon receipt of a statement by the |
|
applicant that there are no comments to the draft permit, draft |
|
notice, and technical memoranda associated with the application. |
|
(o) Notwithstanding the provisions within subsections (a) |
|
through (n) of this section, if the executive director is in receipt |
|
of an application for which it makes a written determination that |
|
published and mailed notice is not required, the executive director |
|
shall grant or deny the application within a total time period not |
|
to exceed 300 days following the receipt of the application. The 300 |
|
day time period shall not include additional time requested by the |
|
applicant for responding to requests for information. |
|
SECTION 2. Section 11.133, Water Code, is amended to read as |
|
follows: |
|
Sec. 11.133. HEARING. (a) At the time and place stated in |
|
the notice, the commission shall hold a hearing on the application. |
|
Any person may appear at the hearing in person or by attorney or may |
|
enter his appearance in writing. Any person who appears may present |
|
objection to the issuance of the permit. The commission may receive |
|
evidence, orally or by affidavit, in support of or in opposition to |
|
the issuance of the permit, and it may hear arguments. |
|
(b) If the commission determines that a public hearing must |
|
be held pursuant to Section 11.132, it shall: |
|
(1) limit the number and scope of issues to be referred |
|
to the State Office of Administrative Hearings for a hearing; and |
|
(2) consistent with the nature and number of issues to |
|
be considered at the hearing, specify the maximum expected duration |
|
of the hearing. |
|
(c) The commission may not refer an issue to the State |
|
Office of Administrative Hearings for a hearing unless the |
|
commission determines that the issue: |
|
(1) involves a disputed question of fact; and |
|
(2) is relevant and material to the decision on the |
|
application. |
|
(d) Once an application has been declared administratively |
|
complete by the commission pursuant to Section 11.129 of this |
|
Chapter and has become the subject of a hearing: |
|
(1) the commission may not revoke the determination |
|
that an application is administratively or technically complete; |
|
(2) the commission may request additional information |
|
from the applicant only if the information is necessary to clarify, |
|
modify, or supplement previously submitted material; and |
|
(3) a request for additional information does not |
|
render the application incomplete. |
|
(e) In a hearing on an application pursuant to this Chapter |
|
that is referred to the State Office of Administrative Hearings, an |
|
administrative law judge may not grant party status to a person |
|
that: |
|
(1) was denied party status by the commission prior to |
|
referral; or |
|
(2) failed to timely seek party status at the |
|
commission. |
|
(f) This provisions of this section shall supersede any |
|
conflicting provisions of law currently in effect. |
|
SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies only |
|
to an application for a permit filed with the Texas Commission on |
|
Environmental Quality on or after the effective date of this Act. An |
|
application filed before the effective date of this Act is governed |
|
by the law in effect on the date the application was filed, and the |
|
prior law is continued in effect for that purpose. |
|
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives |
|
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as |
|
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this |
|
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this |
|
Act takes effect September 1, 2013. |