This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

 
 
  By: Coleman H.B. No. 3773
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to the use of deadly force in defense of a person or
  residence.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Section 9.45, Penal Code, is added to read as
  follows:
         Sec. 9.45.  DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT ONE'S OWN HABITATION
         A person is justified in using deadly force against another
  to protect one's own habitation:
               (1)  if he would be justified in using force against the
  other under Section 9.41; and
               (2)  when and to the degree he reasonably believes the
  deadly force is immediately necessary:
                     (A)  to prevent the other's imminent commission of
  arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the
  nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
                     (B)  to prevent the other who is fleeing
  immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated
  robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the
  property; and
               (3)  he reasonably believes that:
                     (A)  the habitation cannot be protected by any
  other means; or
                     (B)  the use of force other than deadly force to
  protect the habitation would expose the actor or another to a
  substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
         SECTION 2.  Section 9.33, Penal Code, is amended to read as
  follows:
         Sec. 9.33.  DEFENSE OF THIRD PERSON. (a)  A person is
  justified in using force [or deadly force] against another to
  protect a third person if:
               (1)  under the circumstances as the actor reasonably
  believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.31
  [or 9.32] in using force [or deadly force] to protect the actor 
  [himself] against the unlawful force the actor [or unlawful deadly
  force he] reasonably believes to be threatening the third person
  the actor [he] seeks to protect; and
               (2)  the actor reasonably believes that the actor's 
  [his] intervention is immediately necessary to protect the third
  person.
         (b)  A person is justified in using deadly force against
  another to protect a third person if:
               (1)  under the circumstances, the actor would be
  justified under Section 9.32 in using deadly force to protect the
  actor against the unlawful deadly force the actor is substantially
  certain is threatening the third person the actor seeks to protect;
  and
               (2)  the actor is substantially certain that the
  actor's intervention is immediately necessary to protect the third
  person.
         SECTION 3.  Section 9.32, Penal Code, is amended to read as
  follows:
         Sec. 9.32.  DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON. (a) A person
  is justified in using deadly force against another if the actor is:
               (1)  [if the actor would be] justified in using force
  against the other under Section 9.31; [and]
               (2)  unable to safely retreat; and
               (3)  substantially certain [when and to the degree the
  actor reasonably believes] the deadly force is immediately
  necessary:
                     (A)  to protect the actor against the other's use
  or attempted use of unlawful deadly force; or
                     (B)  to prevent the other's imminent commission of
  aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, or aggravated
  sexual assault[, robbery, or aggravated robbery].
         (b)  [The actor's belief under Subsection (a)(2) that the
  deadly force was immediately necessary as described by that
  subdivision is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
               [(1)     knew or had reason to believe that the person
  against whom the deadly force was used:
                     [(A)     unlawfully and with force entered, or was
  attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied
  habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
                     [(B)     unlawfully and with force removed, or was
  attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the
  actor's habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or
                     [(C)     was committing or attempting to commit an
  offense described by Subsection (a)(2)(B);
               [(2)     did not provoke the person against whom the force
  was used; and
               [(3)     was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity,
  other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or
  ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used.
         [(c)]  A person who is in the person's own habitation and 
  [has a right to be present at the location where the deadly force is
  used,] who has not provoked the person against whom the deadly force
  is used[, and who is not engaged in criminal activity at the time
  the deadly force is used] is not required to retreat before using
  deadly force as described by this section.
         [(d)     For purposes of Subsection (a)(2), in determining
  whether an actor described by Subsection (c) reasonably believed
  that the use of deadly force was necessary, a finder of fact may not
  consider whether the actor failed to retreat.]
         SECTION 4.  Article 38.36(b), Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended to read as follows:
         (b)  In a prosecution for murder, if a defendant raises as a
  defense a justification provided by Section 9.31, 9.32, or 9.33,
  Penal Code, the defendant, [in order] to establish the defendant's
  required state of mind [reasonable belief] that use of force or
  deadly force was immediately necessary, regardless of whether the
  defendant's reasonable belief or substantial certainty is
  required, shall be permitted to offer:
         (1)  relevant evidence that the defendant had been the victim
  of acts of family violence committed by the deceased, as family
  violence is defined by Section 71.004, Family Code; and
         (2)  relevant expert testimony regarding the condition of
  the mind of the defendant at the time of the offense, including
  those relevant facts and circumstances relating to family violence
  that are the basis of the expert's opinion.
         SECTION 4.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
  to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act.  
  An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is
  governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed,
  and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.  For
  purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the
  effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred
  before that date.
         SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2013.