83R8029 MEW-D
 
  By: West S.B. No. 969
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to the electronic recording and admissibility of certain
  statements made by an accused as a result of custodial
  interrogation.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Section 2, Article 38.22, Code of Criminal
  Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
         Sec. 2.  No written statement made by an accused as a result
  of custodial interrogation is admissible as evidence against him in
  any criminal proceeding unless:
               (1)  it is shown on the face of the statement that:
                     (A) [(a)]  the accused, prior to making the
  statement, either received from a magistrate the warning provided
  in Article 15.17 of this code or received from the person to whom
  the statement is made a warning that:
                           (i) [(1)]  he has the right to remain silent
  and not make any statement at all and that any statement he makes
  may be used against him at his trial;
                           (ii) [(2)]  any statement he makes may be
  used as evidence against him in court;
                           (iii) [(3)]  he has the right to have a
  lawyer present to advise him prior to and during any questioning;
                           (iv) [(4)]  if he is unable to employ a
  lawyer, he has the right to have a lawyer appointed to advise him
  prior to and during any questioning; and
                           (v) [(5)]  he has the right to terminate the
  interview at any time; and
                     (B) [(b)]  the accused, prior to and during the
  making of the statement, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
  waived the rights set out in the warning prescribed by Paragraph (A) 
  [Subsection (a)] of this subdivision; and
               (2)  an electronic recording that complies with the
  requirements of Section 3(a) of this article is made of the accused
  making the statement [section].
         SECTION 2.  Sections 3(a) and (e), Article 38.22, Code of
  Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows:
         (a)  No oral or sign language statement of an accused made as
  a result of custodial interrogation shall be admissible against the
  accused in a criminal proceeding unless:
               (1)  an electronic recording that includes [, which may
  include] motion picture, video tape, or other visual recording[,]
  is made of the statement;
               (2)  prior to the statement but during the recording
  the accused is given the warning in Subdivision (1)(A) [Subsection
  (a)] of Section 2 above and the accused knowingly, intelligently,
  and voluntarily waives any rights set out in the warning;
               (3)  the recording device was capable of making an
  accurate recording, the operator was competent, and the recording
  is accurate and has not been altered;
               (4)  all persons who speak or are otherwise visible 
  [voices] on the recording are identified; and
               (5)  not later than the 20th day before the date of the
  proceeding, the attorney representing the defendant is provided
  with a true, complete, and accurate copy of all recordings of the
  defendant made under this subsection [article].
         (e)  The courts of this state shall strictly construe
  Subsection (a) of this section and may not interpret Subsection (a)
  as making admissible a statement unless all requirements of the
  subsection have been satisfied by the state, except that:
               (1)  only [voices that are] material persons on a
  recording are identified; and
               (2)  the accused was given the warning in Subdivision
  (1)(A) [Subsection (a)] of Section 2 above or its fully effective
  equivalent.
         SECTION 3.  Article 38.22, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended by adding Section 3A to read as follows:
         Sec. 3A.  Each electronic recording of a statement must be
  preserved until such time as:
               (1)  the defendant's conviction for any offense
  relating to the statement is final, all direct appeals of the case
  are exhausted, and the time to file a petition for a writ of habeas
  corpus has expired; or
               (2)  the prosecution of the offense is barred by law.
         SECTION 4.  Section 3(b), Article 38.22, Code of Criminal
  Procedure, is repealed.
         SECTION 5.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
  to the admissibility of a statement made by an accused on or after
  the effective date of this Act. The admissibility of a statement
  made by an accused before the effective date of this Act is governed
  by the law in effect when the statement was made, and the former law
  is continued in effect for that purpose.
         SECTION 6.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2013.