|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
|
relating to the electronic recording of certain statements made by |
|
an accused as a result of custodial interrogation. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Article 38.22, Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
|
amended by amending Section 1 and adding Section 9 to read as |
|
follows: |
|
Sec. 1. In this article: |
|
(1) "Place of detention" means a police station or |
|
other building that is a place of operation for a law enforcement |
|
agency, including a municipal police department or county sheriff's |
|
department, and is owned or operated by the law enforcement agency |
|
for the purpose of detaining individuals in connection with the |
|
suspected violation of a penal law. The term does not include a |
|
courthouse. |
|
(2) "Written[, a written] statement of an accused" |
|
means a statement signed by the accused or a statement made by the |
|
accused in his own handwriting or, if the accused is unable to |
|
write, a statement bearing his mark, when the mark has been |
|
witnessed by a person other than a peace officer. |
|
Sec. 9. (a) Each law enforcement agency shall adopt, |
|
implement, and amend as necessary a detailed written policy |
|
requiring that a visual recording by motion picture film, |
|
videotape, or other electronic means be made of any statement made |
|
as a result of a custodial interrogation if: |
|
(1) the custodial interrogation is conducted in a |
|
place of detention; or |
|
(2) the custodial interrogation is conducted outside |
|
of a place of detention, and the law enforcement agency has, at the |
|
site of the interrogation, equipment described by this subsection |
|
that is capable of electronically recording the interrogation. |
|
(b) Evidence of compliance with a policy adopted under this |
|
section or with the minimum requirements of this article concerning |
|
the visual recording of a custodial interrogation is not a |
|
condition precedent to the admissibility of a defendant's statement |
|
under this article, another provision of this chapter, or another |
|
law. |
|
(c) Notwithstanding Article 38.23 as that article relates |
|
to a violation of a state statute, a failure to make a visual |
|
recording of a statement made as a result of a custodial |
|
interrogation in substantial compliance with a policy adopted under |
|
this section or with the minimum requirements of this article does |
|
not prohibit the admission of the statement in the courts of this |
|
state. |
|
SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only |
|
to the admissibility of a statement made by an accused on or after |
|
the effective date of this Act. The admissibility of a statement |
|
made by an accused before the effective date of this Act is governed |
|
by the law in effect when the statement was made, and the former law |
|
is continued in effect for that purpose. |
|
SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2013. |
|
|
|
* * * * * |