| |
|
| |
|
|
By: Hancock |
S.B. No. 1383 |
|
|
(In the Senate - Filed March 7, 2013; March 19, 2013, read |
|
|
first time and referred to Committee on Intergovernmental |
|
|
Relations; April 29, 2013, reported adversely, with favorable |
|
|
Committee Substitute by the following vote: Yeas 4, Nays 1; |
|
|
April 29, 2013, sent to printer.) |
| |
|
|
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR S.B. No. 1383 |
By: Nichols |
| |
|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
|
AN ACT
|
| |
|
|
relating to requiring municipalities to reimburse the Texas |
|
|
Department of Transportation for compensation paid for certain |
|
|
signs required to be relocated due to road construction. |
|
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
|
SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 216, Local Government |
|
|
Code, is amended by adding Section 216.016 to read as follows: |
|
|
Sec. 216.016. COSTS OF REMOVAL DUE TO ROAD CONSTRUCTION. |
|
|
(a) If a sign located in a municipality is required to be removed |
|
|
because of the widening, construction, or reconstruction of a road |
|
|
by the Texas Department of Transportation and if relocation of the |
|
|
sign in the municipality would be allowed under department rules |
|
|
but is restricted or prohibited by charter, ordinance, or a |
|
|
decision of the municipality, the municipality shall reimburse the |
|
|
department for any just compensation paid to the owner or lessee of |
|
|
the sign in a condemnation proceeding. |
|
|
(b) For purposes of this section, a sign located in the |
|
|
extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality is considered |
|
|
located in the municipality. |
|
|
SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only |
|
|
to the removal of a sign that occurs on or after the effective date |
|
|
of this Act. |
|
|
SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
* * * * * |