TO: | Honorable Linda Harper-Brown, Chair, House Committee on Government Efficiency & Reform |
FROM: | Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB1675 by Bonnen, Dennis (Relating to governmental entities subject to the sunset review process. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2014 | $0 |
2015 | $0 |
2016 | $0 |
2017 | $0 |
2018 | $0 |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) from Appropriated Receipts 666 |
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from Appropriated Receipts 666 |
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2013 |
---|---|---|---|
2014 | ($296,961) | $296,961 | 3.0 |
2015 | ($30,663) | $30,663 | 3.0 |
2016 | $0 | $0 | 0.0 |
2017 | $0 | $0 | 0.0 |
2018 | $0 | $0 | 0.0 |
For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that reviews for the University Interscholastic League, the Clear Lake City Water Authority, and the Sulphur River Basin Authority reviews would be in addition to other projects scheduled for fiscal years 2014-15 and as such would require an additional three Full-Time-Equivalent positions in each of those years. In addition, this analysis is based on costs realized by the Sunset Advisory Commission for the 2012-13 special purpose review of the Port of Houston Authority. Based on that information, it is assumed that costs of $9,582 would be realized per analyst assigned to a review team for each month required to conduct a review. This amount includes the costs for salaries, benefits, and other operating costs necessary for staff to conduct these reviews. Travel costs are reflected separately below for fiscal year 2014 for each individual project as they vary depending on location. This analysis also assumes that approximately 90 percent of the review time for each project would be required in fiscal year 2014 and the remaining 10 percent would be required in fiscal year 2015.
Based on information provided by the Sunset Advisory Commission, it is assumed that three analysts would be necessary for the University Interscholastic League review which would require six months with travel costs of $10,000. Total costs for this project would total $165,228 in fiscal year 2014 and $17,248 in fiscal year 2015. Regarding the Clear Lake City Water Authority, it is assumed that two analysts would be necessary for the review which would last 4 months with travel costs of $6,000. Total costs for this project would be $74,990 in fiscal year 2014 and $7,666 in fiscal year 2015. Regarding the Sulphur River Basin Authority, it is assumed that two analysts would be necessary for the review which would last 3 months with travel costs of $5,000. Total costs for this project would total $56,743 in fiscal year 2014 and $5,749 in fiscal year 2015. These costs and revenues from payments to the Sunset Advisory Commission as a reimbursement for the special reviews are reflected as Appropriated Receipts in the table above.
This analysis assumes there would be no fiscal impact to the state for changing previously established sunset dates for other entities included in the bill.
Source Agencies: | 116 Sunset Advisory Commission, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
|
LBB Staff: | UP, KJo, MW
|