TO: | Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education |
FROM: | Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB2076 by Flynn (Relating to alternative assessment of certain public school students under the public school accountability system.), As Introduced |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2014 | ($2,340,000) |
2015 | ($2,340,000) |
2016 | ($2,340,000) |
2017 | ($2,340,000) |
2018 | ($2,340,000) |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1 |
---|---|
2014 | ($2,340,000) |
2015 | ($2,340,000) |
2016 | ($2,340,000) |
2017 | ($2,340,000) |
2018 | ($2,340,000) |
Based on information provided by TEA and assuming that districts serving 10 percent of the students in the affected grades applied to participate in the alternative assessment system, the estimated cost to develop and implement an alternative assessment system for students in grade levels 3 through 8 would be $2.3 million per fiscal year. TEA indicated that this estimate assumed that the same form of the test administered in the spring could be used in the fall administration for school districts under the alternative assessment system.
The bill does not limit participation in the alternative assessment system, and to the extent that more districts participate, costs would increase, to an estimated maximum of about $23 million per year, based on an average cost of $7 per student per assessment.
Source Agencies: | 701 Central Education Agency
|
LBB Staff: | UP, JBi, JSc, AH
|